Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Use of 3D Robotic Ultrasound for In Vivo Analysis of Mouse Kidneys
Published on: August 12, 2021
Rock Solid Measurements: A Comparison of Three Methods of Kidney Stone Volume Assessment
Grant Sajdak1, D Daniel Baldwin1, Ala'a Farkouh1
1Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Abstract:
Introduction and Objective: Renal stone volume is an important variable for treatment selection and predicting surgical outcomes. However, the standardized and optimal method for stone volume assessment has not been identified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three methods of volume assessment: the scalene ellipsoid formula, three-dimensional (3D) slicer, and Enterprise Imaging. Methods: A bench top model was created including a torso and kidney based on an actual patient computed tomography (CT). Five kidney stone sets of varying sizes were implanted and scanned using a 64 slice CT scanner. Ten blinded reviewers used the scalene ellipsoid formula, 3D slicer, and Enterprise Imaging to measure kidney stone volume for each stone set. Using these measurements, the methods were compared for inter-rater reliability, accuracy, speed, validity, and convenience. Significance was determined by the Friedman test in addition to using Tukey's post hoc and analysis of variance where appropriate. Results: All three techniques had high inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.98). The mean relative error for Enterprise Imaging (4.9%) was significantly lower than 3D slicer (10.2%; p < 0.001) and the scalene ellipsoid formula (43.8%; p < 0.001). When performed by an expert, Enterprise Imaging (17.8 seconds) was faster than the scalene ellipsoid formula (25.2 seconds; p = 0.006) and both were faster than 3D slicer (196.6 seconds; p < 0.001). Each method was determined to be internally consistent and valid (α > 0.9; R2 > 0.98, respectively). Enterprise Imaging was determined to be significantly more convenient (p < 0.001) than both the scalene ellipsoid formula and 3D slicer. Conclusion: In this study, Enterprise Imaging was a more accurate and efficient tool to measure stone volume. Clinicians can utilize Enterprise Imaging to efficiently determine stone volume and to better select treatment and predict operative and postoperative outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Determination of Renal Drug Clearance: Graphical and Midpoint Methods
The graphical method involves plotting the rate of drug excretion in urine against the plasma drug concentration. By analyzing the graph, the clearance can be calculated and obtained. Drugs rapidly excreted by the kidneys exhibit a...
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies

