Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

08:50
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
7.1K
Constructing a tumor immune microenvironment-driven prognostic model in acute myeloid leukemia using bioinformatics
Amir Abbas Navidinia1, Ali Keshavarz1, Bentol Hoda Kuhestani Dehaghi1
1Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Scientific Reports
|July 18, 2025
Summary
This study developed an immune prognostic model for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using hub differentially expressed genes (hub-DEGs). The model refines risk stratification and identifies potential therapeutic targets by analyzing the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME).
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) significantly impacts prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
- Accurate risk stratification and identification of therapeutic targets are crucial for improving AML patient outcomes.
- Existing prognostic models may not fully capture the complexity of immune cell infiltration and function within the TIME.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a prognostic model for AML based on immune-related hub differentially expressed genes (hub-DEGs).
- To refine risk stratification and identify potential therapeutic targets by analyzing the TIME.
- To validate the model's predictive accuracy and clinical utility in AML patients.
Main Methods:
- Transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA-AML and GEO-AML cohorts were analyzed.
- Immune scores were inferred using ESTIMATE and xCell algorithms.
- Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), hub-DEGs, and prognostic genes were identified through network and survival analyses.
- An immune prognostic model (IPM) was constructed and validated, with correlation analyses to immune cell subsets.
Main Results:
- A total of 680 immune-related DEGs were identified, enriched in immune response pathways.
- Four key genes (CD163, IL10, MRC1, FCGR2B) were selected for the IPM.
- The IPM effectively stratified AML patients into high- and low-risk groups with significantly divergent overall survival (p=0.00072).
- High-risk scores correlated with immunosuppressive immune cell subsets, such as Tregs and M2 macrophages.
Conclusions:
- The developed TIME-centric prognostic model demonstrates clinical utility for AML risk stratification.
- The model aids in identifying potential therapeutic targets within the immune landscape of AML.
- Further prospective validation is warranted to enhance the translational applicability of this prognostic model.

