Nutritional management adherence via an ePRO platform in patients with cancer: a machine learning model study
Si-Wei Xie1, Jia-Xin Huang2, Hui-Min Qu3
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Background:
Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems have significant potential for providing individualized and continuous nutritional management for patients with cancer. However, adherence to ePRO-guided nutritional interventions varies significantly, and the key factors associated with adherence remain poorly understood. This study aimed to assess adherence to nutritional targets via ePRO platforms and identify predictors influencing adherence to optimize management strategies.
Methods:
This multicenter, prospective longitudinal cohort study included 8268 patients with cancer from March 2021 to April 2024 (registration number: ChiCTR2100047535). Adherence was defined as the ratio of actual to prescribed intake for both total energy (TEI) and total protein (TPI). Adherence to TEI and TPI targets was monitored throughout the study period based on prescriptions generated by ePRO-guided nutritional management. The proportion of actual/prescribed intake <60% was set as low adherence. Explainable machine learning models were used to identify predictive features, with SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis ranking variable importance. Two-way fixed-effect logistic regression models were applied to further assess longitudinal predictors of adherence.
Findings:
Among 8268 patients (median age, 61 years; 61.9% male, 38.1% female), 2727 (33.0%) and 3332 (40.3%) failed to meet TEI and TPI targets, respectively. The LightGBM model achieved superior predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: TEI = 0.861, TPI = 0.821). Key predictors of lower adherence to both TEI and TPI included advanced TNM stage (TEI: odds ratio [OR] = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11-1.26; TPI: OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.27-1.53), poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (TEI: OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11-1.26; TPI: OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.27-1.53), higher Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment scores (TEI: OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.08-1.09; TPI: OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07-1.10), elevated platelet counts (TEI: OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01; TPI: OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01), walking time <60 min/day (TEI: OR = 2.42, 95% CI: 2.18-2.69; TPI: OR = 2.59, 95% CI: 2.19-3.06), sleep duration <8 h/day (TEI: OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.25-1.76; TPI: OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.29-1.52), and nausea (TEI: OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.23-1.41; TPI: OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.37-1.51). Conversely, factors associated with higher adherence included female sex and higher levels of serum albumin, alanine transaminase, and glucose.
Interpretation:
In this large multicenter study, over one-third of patients failed to meet ePRO-guided nutritional targets, highlighting substantial challenges in adherence. Further, we identified key predictors associated with low adherence to ePRO-guided nutritional management in patients with cancer, which might help identify at-risk patients and guide future research.
Funding:
Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (320.6750.2021-02-22).
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Treatment Resistant Cancers


