Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands
Published on: August 29, 2019
Smartphone LiDAR for urban forest carbon assessment: A comparative study with traditional methods
Pornperm Sae-Ngow1, Morakot Worachairungreung1, Phonpat Hemwan2
1Geography and Geo-Informatics Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University Bangkok, Thailand.
None:
Urban forestry plays a critical role in enhancing environmental quality and urban livability, making accurate tree growth assessment essential for effective green space management. This study examines methods for measuring tree growth and estimating carbon sequestration using primary data collected from field surveys. The data include diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height (H) from a sample of 50 trees, categorized into two groups: (1) perennial tree species and (2) palm species. Data collection was conducted using both traditional measurement techniques and the Arboreal Tree Height (ATH) application with Smartphone LiDAR.•A comparative analysis of the two methods revealed that DBH measurements had a statistically significant R² value of 0.987, while for tree height, the R² value was 0.897.•In terms of carbon sequestration estimation, perennial trees showed an R² value of 0.950, while palm species yielded an R² value of 0.9524. These findings confirm the reliability of ATH app and allometric equations for accurate carbon sequestration estimation. This methodology enhances data management and carbon sequestration assessments, supporting greenhouse gas reduction and sustainable urban development.

