Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

A Permanent Window for Investigating Cancer Metastasis to the Lung
Published on: July 1, 2021
Modified thoracostomy window as a surgical treatment for chronic pleuropulmonary infections
Francina Valezka Bolaños-Morales1, Pablo Gomes-da Silva de Rosenzweig2,3, Edwin Gustavo Barrientos-Morales1
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Respiratory Diseases "Ismael Cosío Villegas", Mexico City, Mexico.
Background:
It has been reported that up to 30% of patients with empyema require surgical intervention, with procedures such as the Clagett pleural window or the Eloesser flap being the last resort. The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing a conventional thoracic window versus a modified technique.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study between 2012 and 2023 of patients who underwent a conventional or modified thoracic window. The modified technique involved resecting 4 cm of the costal arch, typically at the level of the 5th or 6th rib. The opening was maintained patent, with its edges protected by an Alexis retractor until the infectious process resolved.
Results:
We performed a total of 58 procedures between 2012 and 2023. Of these, 55% (n=32) underwent conventional thoracostomy, while 45% (n=26) were treated with the modified technique. The modified technique was associated with shorter operative times (62 vs. 121 minutes; P<0.001) and less blood loss (78 vs. 245 mL; P=0.001). Similarly, the length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the modified technique group (9 vs. 40 days; P=0.005). When evaluating the type of closure between techniques, we observed that surgical closure predominated in the conventional group (93%, n=13), with only one patient (7%) requiring surgical closure in the modified group. In contrast, spontaneous closure was exclusive to the modified group (n=10) (P<0.001). Finally, no significant difference was observed when comparing the time to window closure. However, the conventional group showed longer intervals [interquartile range (IQR), 223-1,007 days] than the modified technique group (IQR, 154-417 days).
Conclusions:
The benefit of our modified technique was demonstrated; however, a study with a larger number of patients is required to assess its true impact.
Insights
A modified thoracic window technique significantly reduces operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay for empyema patients compared to conventional methods. This approach shows promise for improved surgical outcomes in thoracic infections.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Empyema often necessitates surgical intervention, with procedures like the Clagett pleural window and Eloesser flap used as last resorts.
- Up to 30% of empyema patients require surgical management.
- Conventional thoracic windows are established but may have associated morbidities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing a conventional thoracic window versus a modified technique.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel modified thoracic window approach for managing thoracic infections.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2012 to 2023.
- Patients underwent either a conventional thoracic window or a modified technique involving costal arch resection and Alexis retractor use.
- Postoperative outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and wound closure, were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The modified technique group (45% of procedures) demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (62 vs. 121 minutes) and less blood loss (78 vs. 245 mL) compared to the conventional group (55%).
- Hospital stay was markedly reduced in the modified group (9 vs. 40 days), with spontaneous closure observed in 10 patients versus none in the conventional group.
- While time to window closure showed no significant difference, the conventional group had a wider interval (IQR, 223-1,007 days) than the modified group (IQR, 154-417 days).
Conclusions:
- The modified thoracic window technique offers significant benefits, including reduced operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay.
- The modified technique facilitates spontaneous wound closure, potentially reducing the need for further surgical intervention.
- Further research with larger patient cohorts is warranted to fully ascertain the impact of this modified approach.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due...
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Pleura of the Lungs
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:

