Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.1K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.6K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.9K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.9K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.8K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.0K
Critical Values01:31

Critical Values

7.3K
A critical value is a definite value obtained from a particular probability distribution at a predecided confidence level (or a predecided significance level) for a given population parameter. The critical value provides demarcation that separates the sample statistics that are likely to occur from the ones that are unlikely to occur based on the given probability distribution and the population parameter to be estimated. The critical value for normal distribution is obtained from the z...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From polyamine metabolism genes to immunoproteasome subunits: a transcriptome-based screening of candidate biomarkers in Crohn's disease.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

MYBL2 Knockdown Enhances Ferroptosis and Bortezomib Sensitivity by Transcriptionally Regulating CDKN3 and Inactivating PI3K/Akt Signaling in Multiple Myeloma.

Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology·2026
Same author

Psychological resilience mediates associations between stress related factors and short video addiction among university students.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Five-year survival outcomes from TRANSCEND NHL 001 of lisocabtagene maraleucel in R/R LBCL.

Blood·2026
Same author

Water-soluble anthocyanins from Vaccinium myrtillus L. alleviate diabetic kidney disease by targeting ALOX15-mediated lipid peroxidation.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2026
Same author

SDGD-YOLO: a lightweight detection model for assessing the ripeness of black raspberries in complex greenhouse environments.

Frontiers in plant science·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Confidence Intervals for AUC and pAUC by Empirical Likelihood.

Yumin Zhao1, Xue Ding2, Mai Zhou2

  • 1Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|July 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary

We introduce a novel empirical likelihood method for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. This approach provides accurate confidence intervals and hypothesis testing for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and partial AUC (pAUC).

Keywords:
ROC curvechi‐square distributionnuisance parameterpartial AUCtwo‐sample empirical likelihoodwilks confidence intervals

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

380

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

380

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Diagnostic Test Evaluation

Background:

  • Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and Partial AUC (pAUC) are key metrics for medical diagnostic test performance.
  • Existing methods for AUC and pAUC estimation often involve complex variance calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel two-sample empirical likelihood approach for hypothesis testing and confidence interval construction for AUC and pAUC.
  • To offer a statistically robust and computationally simpler alternative to existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • A two-sample empirical likelihood ratio test is developed for nonparametric settings.
  • The test statistic asymptotically follows a chi-square distribution under the null hypothesis.
  • This method avoids the need to estimate complex scale factors or variances.

Main Results:

  • Simulations demonstrate the proposed method's superior performance compared to competitors across various scenarios.
  • The empirical likelihood ratio test provides an accurate chi-square distribution, simplifying statistical inference.
  • Real-world data examples with accompanying R code are provided to illustrate practical application.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed empirical likelihood method offers a competitive and efficient approach for statistical inference of AUC and pAUC.
  • This method simplifies the process of evaluating medical diagnostic tests, enhancing their reliable application.
  • The study provides valuable tools for researchers and practitioners in medical diagnostics.