Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

150
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
150
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

41.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.1K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

159
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
159
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.5K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.5K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

33.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.7K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing a Computational Model of Interruptions: The Effects of Time Pressure on Interruption and Response Decisions.

Human factors·2025
Same author

Are there jumps in evidence accumulation, and what, if anything, do they reflect psychologically? An analysis of Lévy Flights models of decision-making.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Using mixture modeling to examine differences in perceptual decision-making as a function of the time and method of participant recruitment.

Behavior research methods·2023
Same author

Modality independent or modality specific? Common computations underlie confidence judgements in visual and auditory decisions.

PLoS computational biology·2023
Same author

A systematic investigation into the reliability of inter-temporal choice model parameters.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K

Modeling congruency sequence effects with the revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.

Ping-Shien Lee1, Timothy Ballard1, David K Sewell1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Queensland.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|July 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The congruency sequence effect (CSE) shows cognitive control adapts to conflict. This study reveals top-down processes drive CSE in Simon tasks, while flanker tasks involve both top-down and bottom-up influences for conflict adaptation.

More Related Videos

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.5K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.5K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • The congruency sequence effect (CSE), or Gratton effect, traditionally measures conflict adaptation by observing reduced effects after incongruent trials.
  • Existing theories attribute CSE to either top-down cognitive control or bottom-up associative processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To disentangle the top-down and bottom-up contributions to the CSE in Simon and flanker tasks.
  • To investigate the role of attention-shifting dynamics and memory retrieval in conflict adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Compared standard and modified Simon and flanker tasks to control for memory and learning effects.
  • Utilized the revised diffusion model for conflict tasks to analyze attention-shifting dynamics.
  • Analyzed trials based on response repetition and alternation patterns.

Main Results:

  • CSE in Simon tasks is primarily driven by top-down attentional control, adjusting attention to distractors.
  • Flanker tasks show mixed results, with CSE influenced by both top-down and bottom-up processes.
  • Congruent trials benefit from top-down adjustments, while incongruent trials show bottom-up memory retrieval and reactive control.

Conclusions:

  • The CSE is not solely explained by top-down or bottom-up processes, indicating a complex interplay.
  • A nuanced theoretical framework is needed to integrate top-down and bottom-up mechanisms for a comprehensive understanding of cognitive control.
  • Findings emphasize the dynamic nature of attention and memory in sequential conflict adaptation.