Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics
Published on: January 9, 2016
Differences in Hebbian stimulation effects between biceps and triceps brachii in humans
Carley Lp Butler1,2,3,4, Min-Kyu Lee1,3, Monica A Perez1,2,3,4
1Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Abstract:
Animal and human studies indicate that monosynaptic corticospinal connections are more prevalent in biceps than triceps brachii motoneurons. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that Hebbian stimulation, which targets corticospinal-motoneuronal connections, would enhance corticospinal excitability more in the biceps than the triceps brachii. To test this hypothesis, we assessed motor-evoked potential (MEP) size using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at resting motor threshold (MEP-RMT) and maximum stimulator output (MEP-100%) immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. During Hebbian stimulation, 180 paired pulses were delivered, with corticospinal volleys evoked by TMS arriving at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses 1-2 ms before antidromic potentials from brachial plexus electrical stimulation. Central and peripheral conduction times were similar between muscles. We found that both MEP-RMT and MEP-100% increase in the biceps and triceps immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. The increase in MEP-RMT was greater in the biceps compared with the triceps, whereas MEP-100% changes did not differ between muscles. Since the maximum MEP size was larger in the biceps than in the triceps, we conducted a control experiment testing responses at an intermediate size between MEP-RMT and MEP-100% (MEP-Control), ensuring similar baseline sizes between muscles. Notably, Hebbian stimulation continued to produce a greater increase in MEP-Control in the biceps than in the triceps. These findings suggest that Hebbian plasticity enhances corticospinal excitability more in the elbow flexor than extensor muscles, emphasizing the need to consider muscle-specific innervation patterns when future studies assess the therapeutic effect of this technique in individuals with motor impairment.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Differences in corticospinal projections to elbow flexor and extensor motoneurons are well established. Our findings demonstrate that Hebbian stimulation, based on spike-timing-dependent plasticity, enhances corticospinal excitability more in the biceps brachii than in the triceps brachii. These results highlight the importance of incorporating muscle-specific innervation patterns when designing plasticity-driven therapeutic strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while...
Muscles that Move the Forearm
Forearm Flexors
The biceps brachii, brachialis, and brachioradialis are forearm flexors. The biceps brachii is made up of two heads. Its long head originates at the supraglenoid tubercle of the scapula, whereas that of the short head is...

