Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neuroplasticity01:01

Neuroplasticity

786
Neuroplasticity reflects the brain's remarkable capacity to adapt and evolve, responding dynamically to learning, experiences, or injury by reorganizing its neural circuitry. This reorganization involves creating new neural connections and refining old ones through a series of biological processes that contribute to the brain's lifelong development and adaptability.
786
Long-term Potentiation01:25

Long-term Potentiation

2.9K
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chronic prosthetic joint infection caused by Coxiella burnetii diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing: A case report and literature review.

Journal of infection and public health·2026
Same author

Visual Cortical Plasticity Depends on Stimulus Structure and Temporal Dynamics.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Study on the internal leakage pneumatic noise acoustic characteristics of spring-loaded full-lift safety valve.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Application of a deep learning method based on CBCT panoramic reconstruction images for differentiating operationally defined cystic and neoplastic jaw lesions from osteomyelitis: a single-center retrospective study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The prevalence of insomnia disorder in inpatient psychiatric care.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2026
Same author

NOD-like immune receptor Prf prevents ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation of the defense-related transcription factor SlNAC1.

Plant physiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

609

Resolving inconsistent effects of tDCS on learning using a homeostatic structural plasticity model.

Han Lu1,2,3,4, Lukas Frase5, Claus Normann6,7

  • 1Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Frontiers in Network Physiology
|July 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Homeostatic structural plasticity (HSP) models explain how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects motor learning. Targeted tDCS during or after learning can strengthen neural connections, while improper application may weaken them.

Keywords:
cell assemblyhomeostatic structural plasticitymotor learningspiking neural networktDCS

More Related Videos

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

29.0K
Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain
08:26

Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain

Published on: July 1, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

609
Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

29.0K
Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain
08:26

Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain

Published on: July 1, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Motor Learning

Background:

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely used to modulate motor learning, but its effects are inconsistent.
  • Existing models of Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity have limitations in explaining tDCS outcomes.
  • A homeostatic structural plasticity (HSP) model offers a potential framework to resolve contradictory findings in tDCS research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement and test a homeostatic structural plasticity (HSP) model for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the context of motor learning.
  • To investigate the impact of tDCS timing, polarity, and application method on neural engram connectivity during motor learning.

Main Methods:

  • A spiking neural network model incorporating motor learning and tDCS under HSP was developed.
  • The study quantified tDCS effects by analyzing the anatomical connectivity of the neural engram formed during motor learning.

Main Results:

  • tDCS applied before learning showed minimal effects, reducing connectivity when applied uniformly.
  • Targeted anodal tDCS during learning strengthened the engram; cathodal or uniform stimulation weakened it.
  • Targeted cathodal tDCS after learning enhanced engram connectivity, whereas anodal tDCS did not.
  • Non-targeted or strong tDCS could distort the engram structure.

Conclusions:

  • The HSP model successfully explains various tDCS effects on motor learning, aligning with both Hebbian and homeostatic principles.
  • Memory strength is proposed to correlate positively with engram connectivity, providing a unified explanation for tDCS outcomes.
  • The HSP model serves as a valuable framework for understanding the complex interplay between motor learning and tDCS.