Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026
Imaging Features of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Published on: June 16, 2020
Association of Abatacept With Lower Mortality Risk Compared to Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated
Po-Cheng Shih1,2, Shiow-Ing Wang3,4, Qing-Wen Wang1,5,6,7
1Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Objective:
The optimal treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) remains uncertain, and direct comparative data between biologics are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abatacept compared with rituximab in patients with RA-ILD.
Methods:
An emulated target trial was designed using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network database, including patients with RA-ILD, diagnosed between 2007 and 2024. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups (abatacept and rituximab). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included respiratory events, medical utilization, and infection-related adverse events. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to use Cox proportional hazards models.
Results:
In total, 1,615 patients per group were identified after matching for analysis. Abatacept was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with rituximab (HR, 0.689; 95% CI, 0.581-0.818) and a reduced risk of mechanical ventilation (HR, 0.698; 95% CI, 0.521-0.934). The subgroup analyses yielded consistent findings. Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with concomitant connective tissue diseases also demonstrated consistent results (mortality: HR, 0.679; 95% CI, 0.570-0.810), reinforcing the robustness of the findings.
Conclusion:
Abatacept was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with rituximab in patients with RA-ILD. Because clinicians may preferentially reserve abatacept for less aggressive RA-ILD, residual confounding by indication cannot be excluded; thus, the association should not be interpreted as proof of causality. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm whether abatacept confers a true survival advantage.
