Comparison of adverse effects of combined and isolated substances in Intracavernosal injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
Arthur Santos Lima1, Beatriz de Carvalho Villela1, Hugo Nunes Pustilnik2
1Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, School of Medicine, 40296-000, Brotas, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Background:
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly prevalent condition that significantly impairs quality of life, and while intracavernosal injection (ICI) therapy remains an effective treatment option, it is frequently associated with adverse effects such as pain, priapism, and penile fibrosis.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to review observational and randomized studies and compare the adverse effects of intracavernosal injection therapy using isolated and combined substances.
Methods:
Observational and randomized studies published up to November 11, 2024 were searched in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Twelve studies were included in the review, of which 5 were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 7 were non-RCTs, and of these 9 were included in meta-analysis. All of them evaluate the presence of side effects when administering drugs via ICI.
Outcomes:
The primary outcomes were adverse effects, including pain, priapism, and fibrosis.
Results:
As results, the variable "pain" did not show a significant difference between the groups (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.03-18.14, P = 0.82). "Priapism" had a significant result when analyzing all articles together, having minimal presence in the isolated group (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.03-3.20, P = 0.04), however when analyzing only the RCTs there was no significant difference between the groups. Only four studies analyzed fibrosis as an outcome, with rates ranging from 0.8% to 15%. Notably, only two studies assessed fibrosis separately between the "combined drugs" and "isolated" groups, reporting varying rates across these categories. Clinical implications: These findings emphasize the need for individualized treatment strategies in intracavernosal therapy, as no consistent advantage was observed for combination therapy over monotherapy in minimizing adverse effects.
Strengths And Limitations:
The main limitations of this study were the small number of available articles and the lack of more recent publications on the topic.
Conclusion:
This study reviewed the main adverse effects of intracavernosal injection therapy for ED, emphasizing the need for a personalized approach, as no significant differences were observed between monotherapy and combination therapy regarding pain, fibrosis, and priapism.
More Related Videos
02:58Combination of High Ligation and Intraoperative Embolization using Polidocanol for Treatment of Varicoceles
Published on: December 22, 2023
09:49Isolation of Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: December 28, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Combined Effects of Drugs: Antagonism
The most common type is receptor antagonism, where one drug acts as an antagonist to block the effects of another drug by...
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...