Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Longitudinal Associations between Changes in Inter-Ankle SBP Difference and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in
Daniela Charry1, Jing Xu2, Michelle L Meyer3
1Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Background:
Large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure (IASBP) differences (≥10 or ≥15 mmHg) have been linked to cardiovascular events and mortality. This longitudinal study evaluated the association of changes in IASBP differences with incident cardiovascular events and mortality.
Methods:
In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, bilateral ankle blood pressure was measured at Visit 5 and at Visit 6/7 (n = 2051; mean age 73.7 ± 4.3 years). Participants were categorized into four groups by IASBP differences: small at both visits (<10 mmHg); decreasing (≥10 mmHg at Visit 5 but <10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); increasing (<10 mmHg at Visit 5 but ≥10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); and large at both visits (≥10 mmHg). Categories were repeated using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs).
Results:
In adjusted analyses, individuals with increasing differences (≥10 mmHg) had higher risks of heart failure (HR: 1.31; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.00-1.76) and stroke (HR: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.11), compared to those with small differences at both visits. Similarly, those with persistently large differences showed elevated risks of coronary heart disease (HR: 2.25; 95% CI, 1.46-3.47) and stroke (HR: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-2.41). Analyses using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value demonstrated even stronger associations with all three cardiovascular events. No significant associations were observed with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality for these categories.
Conclusions:
Increasing and persistently large IASBP differences are associated with elevated risk of incident cardiovascular events. Monitoring IASBP differences may help identify individuals at higher risk for adverse outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
08:42Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Measurement of Blood Pressure