Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

177
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
177
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.6K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

291
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
291
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.1K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.1K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.0K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.0K
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

11.3K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diverse functions and pathogenetic role of Crumbs in retinopathy.

Cell communication and signaling : CCS·2024
Same author

Enhancing Global Estimation of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations by Including Geophysical <i>a Priori</i> Information in Deep Learning.

ACS ES&T air·2024
Same author

Macrophage membrane-coated nanoparticles for the treatment of infectious diseases.

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)·2024
Same author

Study on the secondary oxidation behavior and microscopic characteristics of oxidized coal gangue.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2024
Same author

Delaying the first nucleation event of amorphous solid dispersions above the polymer overlap concentration (c*): PVP and PVPVA in posaconazole.

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences·2024
Same author

A dynamic prediction model of landslide displacement based on VMD-SSO-LSTM approach.

Scientific reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Treatment Comparison for a Single Arm Study Utilizing External Control: Performing Inference when Imputing Potential

Wei-Chen Chen1, Nelson Lu2, Chenguang Wang3

  • 1Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
|July 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel method for comparing investigational products to controls using external data when randomization isn't possible. The approach uses a potential outcome model to estimate control outcomes, enabling treatment effect inference.

Keywords:
External controlPotential outcomePotential outcome model (POM)Single-arm studyTreatment comparison

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Non-randomized studies are crucial for treatment comparisons when randomization is impractical.
  • External control data is often used alongside single-arm investigational product studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and demonstrate an alternative statistical approach for treatment effect inference.
  • To enable valid comparisons between investigational products and external controls in challenging trial designs.

Main Methods:

  • Develop a potential outcome model (POM) for control treatment outcomes using external data.
  • Impute potential outcomes for single-arm study subjects under control treatment.
  • Compare imputed control outcomes with observed investigational product outcomes for inference.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method provides a proof of concept for treatment effect inference.
  • Illustrates the approach using a normal distribution endpoint and linear regression POM.
  • Enables comparative effectiveness research in the absence of randomization.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical approach offers a viable method for comparative inference.
  • Facilitates the use of external control data in single-arm investigational studies.
  • Addresses a critical need in clinical research where randomization is not feasible.