Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
Multiply doses of FDC of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin monotherapy in Chinese patients with
Xianyou Ji1, Jinlan Xia2, Hong Zhang3
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Daqing People's Hospital, Daqing, 163000, China.
Insights
The fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) more effectively than rosuvastatin alone in hypercholesterolemia patients. This combination therapy demonstrated superior efficacy and a favorable safety profile.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Hypercholesterolemia management often requires combination therapy for optimal lipid-lowering.
- Rosuvastatin and ezetimibe act through distinct mechanisms to reduce cholesterol levels.
- Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) offer potential advantages in patient adherence and therapeutic effect.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe FDC versus rosuvastatin monotherapy.
- To evaluate the lipid-lowering effects of the combination in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
- To assess achievement of lipid targets, particularly in high-risk populations.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III clinical trial (ROSE-CH) was conducted.
- 743 patients were randomized into five groups: rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (10/10, 5/10, 2.5/10 mg) and rosuvastatin (10, 5 mg).
- Patients were stratified by baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.
Main Results:
- Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe FDC groups showed significantly greater LDL-C reduction compared to rosuvastatin alone at 12 weeks (P < 0.001).
- Higher achievement of LDL-C targets was observed in FDC groups, especially in very high ASCVD risk patients.
- Adverse event incidence was comparable across groups, with no serious drug-related adverse events reported.
Conclusions:
- The fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe provides superior LDL-C-lowering efficacy compared to rosuvastatin monotherapy.
- The combination therapy is well-tolerated and demonstrates a good safety profile in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
- Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe FDC is an effective treatment option for managing hypercholesterolemia.
Objective:
Rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe improves the lipid-lowering effect through different mechanisms of action. This study intended to compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe vs. rosuvastatin alone in hypercholesterolemia patients.
Methods:
ROSE-CH (ROSuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Chinese Hypercholesterolemia patients) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, positive drug-controlled, superiority-tested phase III clinical trial; 743 patients were randomized into rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg, 5/10 mg, and 2.5/10 mg groups, as well as rosuvastatin 10 mg and 5 mg groups at a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio. A total of 143, 127, 263, and 137 patients had low, intermediate, high, and very-high baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risks. The study period spanned from December 24, 2021, to December 6, 2022.
Results:
Efficacy and safety assessments were conducted in 670 and 696 patients. Percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to week (W)12 was greater in the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg group vs. rosuvastatin 10 mg group [least-squares means (LSmean): -51.48% vs. -42.47%], rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 5/10 group vs. rosuvastatin 5 mg group (LSmean: -50.08% vs. -40.17%), and rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 2.5/10 mg group vs. the rosuvastatin 5 mg group (LSmean: -48.47% vs. -40.17%) (all P < 0.001). The same trend was observed for the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to W4 and W8 (all P < 0.001). In patients with baseline very high ASCVD risk, the achievement of LDL-C target at W12 was higher in rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg vs. rosuvastatin 10 mg groups and rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 2.5/10 mg vs. rosuvastatin 5 mg groups (both P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events was 36.0%, 38.7%, 25.2%, 31.4%, and 38.6% in each group. Regarding serious adverse events, the incidence was 2.2%, 2.9%, 0.7%, 3.6%, and 0.7% in each group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was relatively high, which was 26.6%, 31.4%, 18.5%, 23.6%, and 29.0% in each group, respectively, irrespective of the absence of serious drug-related adverse events.
Conclusion:
The FDC of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe has superior LDL-C-lowering effects over rosuvastatin alone, with good safety profiles in hypercholesterolemia patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Lipids: Dietary Sources and Requirements

