Tightrope vs. hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and
Brandon Lim1, Ariel Chai1, Samher Jassim2
1Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Background:
Treatment for acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations aims to restore joint congruity and mechanical stability. However, the best operative technique remains a controversial issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis thus aim to compare the clavicular hook plate (HP) vs. the TightRope (TR) in the management of ACJ dislocation.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted using Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to retrieve all relevant studies. Outcomes were operative time (minutes), intraoperative blood loss (mL), clinical outcome measures, postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and complications. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies tool for nonrandomized studies, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized control trials.
Results:
The literature search yielded 221 studies, of which 12 studies enrolling a total of 683 patients were included in this review, with 371 in the HP group and 312 in the TR group. Meta-analysis of comparative studies between HP and TR fixation showed that HPs had better Constant-Murley scores (mean difference (MD), -3.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.37 to -1.75; P = .0001), and less intraoperative blood losses (MD, 41.27; 95% CI, 30.67-51.87; P < .00001). Conversely, TR fixation had better visual analog scale scores (MD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.76; P < .0001), and shorter postoperative CCD (MD, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; P = .0008). There was no significant difference in operative time (MD, 1.75; 95% CI, -16.55-20.05; P = .85), University of California, Los Angeles shoulder scores (MD, 0.34; 95% CI, -0.81 to 1.48; P = .56), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (MD, 0.39; 95% CI, -0.90 to 1.68; P = .55), and complications (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.00-6.62; P = .05).
Conclusion:
TR fixation in ACJ dislocations had similar operative times, complication rates, University of California, Los Angeles scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores to HP fixation. The HP group had less intraoperative blood loss and better Constant-Murley scores. Conversely, TR fixation had better visual analog scale scores and smaller postoperative CCD. Future randomized control trials on this subject would aid in increasing the validity of our findings.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
01:09Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
01:20Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
01:30Method of Joints
Since plane truss members are in the same plane, each joint is subjected to a coplanar and concurrent force system. To apply the method of joints, the first step is to...