Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
How Well Do Different AI Language Models Inform Patients About Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Veins?
Ayman Zyada1, Ayman Fakhry2, Sohiel Nagib3
1Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Grok-3 and ChatGPT-4 offer the best AI-generated patient education on radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins. While AI shows promise, further evaluation is crucial before widespread clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Growing public reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) for medical information.
- Uncertainty regarding the accuracy and clarity of AI-generated medical advice, specifically for procedures like radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for varicose veins.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the quality of AI-generated responses from leading LLMs concerning radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for varicose veins.
- To assess the reliability, clarity, and usefulness of AI answers to common patient questions about RFA, as judged by expert vascular surgeons.
Main Methods:
- A blinded, comparative observational study involving 32 vascular surgeons.
- Standardized questions on RFA for varicose veins were posed to five top LLMs: ChatGPT-4, DeepSeek-R1, Gemini 2.0, Grok-3, and LLaMA 3.1.
- Surgeons evaluated responses based on accuracy, clarity, relevance, and depth, with statistical analysis (Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests) to determine performance.
Main Results:
- Grok-3 provided the highest quality responses in 51.6% of cases, significantly outperforming other models (p < 0.0001).
- ChatGPT-4 ranked second (23.1%), with Gemini, DeepSeek, and LLaMA showing comparable, lower performance.
- Grok-3 excelled in procedural risks and post-procedure care responses, while ChatGPT-4 was best for introductory information. A significant portion of surgeons remained hesitant to recommend AI tools.
Conclusions:
- Grok-3 and ChatGPT-4 currently offer the most reliable AI-generated patient education for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of varicose veins.
- AI tools demonstrate potential for enhancing patient understanding and reducing physician workload, but require ongoing evaluation and cautious integration.
- This study provides a benchmark for future AI technology comparisons in medical applications.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
03:14Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024