Cues for tone-in-noise detection: Evidence from constant-stimuli and adaptive approaches
Braden N Maxwell1, Andrew J Oxenham1
1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Listeners use both level and temporal cues for tone-in-noise (TIN) detection. This study explored how limiting access to these cues affects detection, finding both play a role, with level cues being more important in narrowband conditions.
Area of Science:
- Auditory perception
- Psychoacoustics
- Signal detection theory
Background:
- Tone-in-noise (TIN) detection is crucial for understanding speech and sound perception.
- Existing research presents conflicting findings on the primary auditory cues listeners utilize for TIN detection.
- The relative importance of spectral (level) and temporal cues in TIN detection remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specific roles of level and temporal cues in TIN detection.
- To examine how manipulating access to these cues influences detection performance.
- To determine if individual differences in cue weighting exist and are consistent.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a within-subjects design with 24 young normal-hearing listeners.
- Employed narrowband and broadband noise conditions to vary spectral content.
- Manipulated access to level cues (spectral rescaling) and temporal cues (signal replacement).
- Used both adaptive and constant-stimuli procedures to measure detection thresholds and performance without feedback.
Main Results:
- Both level and temporal cues were found to contribute significantly to TIN detection.
- Level cues played a more dominant role in the narrowband noise condition.
- Performance under adaptive procedures correlated with performance under constant-stimuli, indicating stable individual cue weighting.
Conclusions:
- Both spectral (level) and temporal cues are essential for effective tone-in-noise detection.
- The salience and utility of these cues can vary depending on the acoustic environment (e.g., noise bandwidth).
- Individual listeners exhibit consistent preferences for weighting specific auditory cues in detection tasks.
More Related Videos
10:50Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
Published on: June 6, 2012
06:22Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro
Published on: August 28, 2019
