Pectus Arcuatum Definitions, Diagnostics, and Surgical Guidelines: A Systematic Review

Pectus arcuatum is a rare anterior chest wall deformity that is often confused with excavatum, carinatum, or a mixed deformity. A complete understanding of its clinical and physiological basis will improve diagnostic accuracy and allow for standardized management.

To gain a comprehensive understanding of pectus arcuatum, focusing on its nomenclatures, epidemiology, classification, pathophysiology, preoperative presentation and assessments, management options, and surgical outcomes.

PubMed, Google Scholar, and subsequent reference searches were used to extract original studies addressing pectus arcuatum fully or partially. The searches were performed on February 2, 2025. Two independent reviewers screened articles based on preestablished inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was performed, but given the rarity of arcuatum and the limited, heterogeneous nature of available literature, none of the studies were excluded based on the level of evidence or quality assessments. Using a standardized data extraction form, results were synthesized and presented as a review with recommendations to guide clinical decision-making.

A total of 65 studies were included in the final review. Of those, 37 (56.9%) were cohort studies, 18 (27.7%) were case reports, 8 (12.3%) were case series, and 2 (3.1%) were technical reports. A total of 455 cases of pectus arcuatum were represented. Heterogeneity was found in nomenclature, epidemiology, associated conditions, assessments, management, and outcomes. An open surgical approach and, more recently, hybrid open and minimally invasive technique are reported for surgical repair. Postoperative outcomes were good in most surgical series, with no significant difference when compared with the repair of other pectus deformities.

Results of this systematic review reveal that pectus arcuatum is a rare variant of pectus deformities that is distinct from carinatum and excavatum. Unified terminology and standardized diagnostic criteria are important to facilitate proper management. Minimally invasive hybrid approaches continue to refine outcomes, balancing invasiveness with efficacy.