Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Effects of a Novel Neuromuscular Training Intervention on Jump, Sprint, and Change of Direction in Adult Female Soccer Players
Published on: June 10, 2025
Warm-Up Strategies at Halftime: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial in a Professional Women's Soccer Team
Marco Abreu1, Fábio Y Nakamura2, Thiago Carvalho1
1Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto (FADEUP), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Two 3-minute halftime re-warm-up protocols, strength, plyometrics, and balance (SPBP) versus soccer-specific (SSP), showed no significant differences in player performance or readiness. Both protocols are practical for in-game use, with player preference being a key factor.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Exercise Physiology
- Performance Analysis
Background:
- Maintaining optimal physical and physiological readiness during halftime is crucial for professional athletes.
- Active re-warm-up strategies during the interval may mitigate performance decrements.
- Limited research exists on the comparative effectiveness of different short-duration halftime re-warm-up protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of a strength, plyometrics, and balance protocol (SPBP) versus a soccer-specific protocol (SSP) during the final three minutes of halftime.
- To assess the impact of these protocols on 20-m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, and perceived readiness (ARMS).
Main Methods:
- Twenty-two professional soccer players participated in a simulated match, randomized to either SPBP or SSP during halftime.
- Sprint and CMJ performance were measured pre-warm-up and post-re-warm-up.
- The Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale (ARMS) questionnaire assessed perceived readiness.
Main Results:
- No significant interaction effects were found between protocols and time points for sprint or CMJ performance.
- A significant decrease in 20-m sprint performance was observed post-re-warm-up compared to pre-match.
- No significant differences were found between SPBP and SSP in terms of performance or perceived readiness (ARMS).
Conclusions:
- Both 3-minute SPBP and SSP are practical halftime re-warm-up interventions with comparable effects on physical performance and perceived readiness.
- Player preference may guide the choice of protocol, although SSP faces practical field access limitations.
- Further research comparing active re-warm-ups to passive controls is recommended to ascertain true effectiveness.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Facilitation
Decreased Body Temperature
Masonry in Cold and Hot Weather Conditions
Other key practices include keeping masonry units...
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Motion of a Projectile
Horizontal motion, governed by the initial kick, maintains a constant velocity throughout the flight of the soccer ball.
Cold Weather Concreting
To counteract the negative impacts of cold weather, ensuring...

