Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing
Published on: July 5, 2019
Fusion oncoproteins and cooperating mutations define disease phenotypes in NUP98-rearranged leukemia
Masayuki Umeda1, Ryan Lea Hiltenbrand1, Nicole L Michmerhuizen1
1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Abstract:
Leukemias with NUP98 rearrangements exhibit heterogeneous phenotypes such as acute myeloid leukemia, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), or myelodysplastic syndrome/neoplasms associated with fusion partners, whereas the mechanism responsible for this heterogeneity is poorly understood. Through genome-wide mutational and transcriptional analyses of 177 NUP98-rearranged leukemias, we show that cooperating alterations are associated with differentiation status even among leukemias sharing the same NUP98 fusions, such as NUP98::KDM5A acute megakaryocytic leukemia with RB1 loss or T-ALL with NOTCH1 mutations. CUT&RUN profiling of in vitro cord blood CD34+ cell (cbCD34) models of major NUP98 fusions revealed that NUP98-fusion oncoproteins (FOs) directly regulate differentiation-related genes contributing to the disease phenotypes, represented by NUP98::KDM5A binding to MEIS2 or GFI1B for megakaryocyte (MK) differentiation. In patient samples, NUP98-FO binding patterns are heterogeneous, potentially shaped by somatic mutations and differentiation status. Using cbCD34 models and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, we show that RB1 loss cooperates with NUP98::KDM5A by blocking terminal differentiation toward platelets and expanding MK-like cells, whereas WT1 frameshift mutations skew differentiation toward dormant lymphoid-myeloid primed progenitor cells and cycling granulocyte-monocyte progenitor cells, providing evidence for NUP98-rearranged leukemia phenotypes affected by cooperating alterations. NUP98::KDM5A cbCD34 models with RB1 or WT1 alterations have different sensitivities to menin inhibition, suggesting that cellular differentiation provides stage-specific menin dependencies and resistance mechanisms that can be leveraged for future treatment strategies for NUP98-rearranged leukemia.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Abnormal Proliferation
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...

