Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
The physiological cost of leadership in collective movements
Hanja B Brandl1, James A Klarevas-Irby2, Daniel Zuñiga3
1Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany; Department of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78646 Konstanz, Germany; Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Individuals can gain substantial benefits from collective actions.1,2,3,4,5,6,7 However, collective behaviors introduce new challenges, like coordinating actions, maintaining cohesion, and meeting the needs of different individuals. When making collective movements, leaders are typically thought to gain disproportionate benefits through the choice of more beneficial resources3 and/or earlier access to resources.8 However, reaping these benefits can also come with costs. Attempting to influence group movements can increase energy expenditure4,9,10 and predation exposure.11,12 Moreover, leadership involves a process of negotiation in many animal groups. Within-group differences in directional preferences are typically resolved by some individuals initiating directional movements, after which they are either followed (if they are successful in leading) or return to the group (if they fail).13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 By combining data on movement initiations (using whole-group global positioning system [GPS] tracking31) and individual heart rate (from implanted electrocardiogram [ECG] loggers) in wild vulturine guineafowl, we found significant increases in heart rate (and decreases in heart rate variability) during collective movements. Further, we found that attempting-and failing-to initiate directional movement was physiologically costly, especially for leadership attempts when consensus among group members was low and when potential leaders acted against the majority. The scale of these costs far outweighed those arising from increased movement speeds alone, suggesting that leadership can induce physiological stress, entailing increased energy expenditure and potential physiological damage. These results suggest that behaviors often thought beneficial to individuals (by influencing group behaviors) are also physiologically costly, representing a constraint on group-living and explaining why sometimes individuals opt out of contributing to leadership.
More Related Videos
06:26Author Spotlight: Exploring Breathing Techniques and Digital Solutions for Enhancing Running Performance
Published on: September 27, 2024
10:45A Community-based Stress Management Program: Using Wearable Devices to Assess Whole Body Physiological Responses in Non-laboratory Settings
Published on: January 22, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Social Loafing
Physiological Foundation of Stress
Role of the Sympathetic Nervous System
Adrenaline triggers the...
Physiological Barriers
The blood endothelial barrier is the most porous of these. It allows all small ionized, un-ionized, and lipophilic molecules to pass through the endothelial lining into the interstitial space...
Clearance Models: Physiological Models
The organ's clearance rate depends on the blood flow to the organ and the extraction ratio (E). The extraction ratio describes the organ's...
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle