Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
Esophageal Heating and Damage With High-Power-Short-Duration Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Ablation
Armen A Kocharian1, Adi Lador1, Sufen Wang1
1Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background:
High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and pulsed-field ablation (PFA) are intended to limit esophageal damage. The actual esophageal heating and damage risk are unclear.
Objectives:
This study sought to assess luminal esophageal temperature (LET) kinetics and esophageal risk of HPSD and PFA.
Methods:
Included in this study were: 1) in vivo swine undergoing pulmonary vein ablation adjacent to the esophagus, using SmartTouch SF (STSF) (50W/10s, n = 8), QDOT (90W/4s, n = 8); or PFA (n = 12) using STSF Dual Energy or Omnypulse (OMNY) catheters (Biosense Webster); and 2) ex vivo swine esophagi. We collected LET, LET rise rate (dT/dt), postablation LET rises, and histology of the esophagus acutely and after 1 month.
Results:
Peak LET and dT/dt were higher in 50W/10s vs 90W/4s (41.8 ± 2.8 °C vs 39.7 ± 1.2 °C; P = 0.001). The bulk of LET rises with 90W/4s were postablation LET rises. All RF-ablated pigs had acute esophageal lesions, but only 50W/10s led to mucosal lesions or persisted after 1 month. Lesions after 90w/4s were limited to the muscularis externa. For PFA, peak LET and dT/dt were higher in STSF (40 ± 1.6 °C) vs OMNY (37.8 ± 0.7 °C; P = 0.001; maximum LETs: 43.8 °C and 39.2 °C, respectively). Acute muscularis externa lesions were observed in 4 of 4 pigs with STSF and 3 of 4 with OMNY, irrespective of LET rises. There were no detectable lesions at 30 days with PFA using either catheter design. Ex vivo experiments showed comparable LET rises for RFA and PFA-STSF.
Conclusions:
LET rises and acute esophageal damage can occur with RFA-HPSD and PFA. However, PFA-induced esophageal damage was independent of PFA thermal effects and not detectable at 30 days.
More Related Videos
04:58Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
05:43Author Spotlight: Improving Lesion Contiguity in Pulmonary Vein Isolation via Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...