Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Effect of community-led total sanitation on open defecation in Uganda: A propensity score-matched analysis
John Bosco Asiimwe1, Hellen Namawejje2, Faith Rachel Mirembe3
1Department of Planning and Applied Statistics, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Abstract:
A substantial proportion (7%) of people in Uganda practice open defecation. A Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) project was started in 2011 to reduce indiscriminate disposal of excreta but the effect has not been rigorously evaluated. We, therefore, evaluated the effect of CLTS on reducing open defecation in the program intervention districts in Uganda. We used the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) data to conduct a quasi-experimental study using a propensity score matching (PSM) approach. The intervention group consisted of districts that implemented the CLTS and the comparison group were districts that did not implement the CLTS. We matched the intervention and comparison groups on several covariates in a 1:1 ratio within a caliper of 20% of the standard deviation of the propensity score. We confirmed balance in covariates using standardized mean difference (SMD) being <0.1 or 10%. We applied a conditional logit regression model on the matched dataset adjusting for matched pairs to estimate the intervention effect, reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the robustness of the estimate using Mantel-Haenszel sensitivity analysis. There were 17,415 participants (4,373 intervention vs. 13,042 comparison) before PSM and 8,470 participants (4,235 comparison vs. 4,235 intervention) after PSM. In the unmatched weighted dataset, 5.4% of participants had open defecation (7.9% intervention vs. 4.6% comparison). In the matched weighted data, open defecation was 9.3% and 7.6% in the comparison and intervention groups, respectively. Results show that CLTS reduced the prevalence of open defecation by 37% (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0-54-0.74) and this finding is robust to unmeasured confounders (Gamma = 1.35, p = 0.052). We recommend the scale-up of CLTS to the remaining districts by the Government of Uganda to reduce open defecation.
More Related Videos
09:02A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
Published on: June 7, 2017
04:57Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
Published on: April 25, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury. The nails must be short and clean, without nail...
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps