Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colposcopy in a Resource-Limited Population
Yining Chang1, Tingyuan Li, Qiang Zhou
1College of Public Health, Chengdu Medical College, the Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, the Sichuan Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, and the Department of Pathology and the School of Medicine and Nursing, Chengdu University, Chengdu, the Mianyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital and the Yanting County Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Mianyang, and the College of Public Health, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Objective:
This study evaluates the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) colposcopy in detecting cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in real-world scenarios within resource-limited areas.
Methods:
This is a cross-sectional study. Participants with positive human papilloma virus results or who were cytologic positive were referred for colposcopy, during which AI colposcopy was implemented. Biopsies were performed for positive findings suggested by either the colposcopist or the AI system. For the analysis, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ and CIN 3+. Histopathology was the gold standard for disease diagnosis.
Results:
A total of 825 women underwent colposcopy, with 99 (12.0%) diagnosed with CIN 2+ and 53 (6.4%) with CIN 3+. Positive findings were reported in 392 women (47.5%) under conventional colposcopy and 640 (77.6%) with AI colposcopy. The sensitivity for detecting CIN 2+ was significantly higher for AI colposcopy (96.0%) and AI-assisted colposcopy (100%) than for conventional colposcopy (85.9%, P =.026, P <.001, respectively). In postmenopausal women, the sensitivities of AI colposcopy (94.3%) and AI-assisted colposcopy (100%) surpassed that of conventional colposcopy (77.4%, P =.026, P <.001, respectively). Artificial intelligence-assisted colposcopy also significantly enhanced the sensitivity of junior colposcopists with less than 10 years of clinical experience, achieving 100% compared with 84.6% by conventional colposcopy ( P =.001), and improved detection in women with a squamocolumnar junction that was not visible (100% vs 70.4%, P =.004). For CIN 3+, the sensitivity of AI-assisted colposcopy was superior to that of conventional colposcopy (100% vs 86.8%, P =.013). In postmenopausal women, the sensitivities of both AI colposcopy and AI-assisted colposcopy were 100%; however, the sensitivity of conventional colposcopy was 77.8% ( P =.023).
Conclusion:
Artificial intelligence-assisted colposcopy enhances sensitivity in detecting CIN 2+ and CIN 3+, particularly among postmenopausal women. Moreover, it improves the diagnostic performance of junior colposcopists and improves detection in women with a squamocolumnar junction that is not visible.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
03:43Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025