The occurrence and histopathological recognition of atypical endometriosis in patients with ovarian endometriosis - a retrospective cohort study
- 1Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Netherlands.
- 2Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Netherlands.
- 3Radboud University Medical Centre, Netherlands.
- 4Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Netherlands.
- 5GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Netherlands.
- 6Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Centre, Netherlands.
- 0Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Netherlands.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Atypical endometriosis (AE) diagnosis shows high variability among pathologists. Stricter criteria were developed to improve consistent identification of AE, a potential precursor to endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma.
Area Of Science
- Gynecologic Pathology
- Oncology
- Histopathology
Background
- Atypical endometriosis (AE) is a potential precursor to endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC).
- Current identification of AE lacks clinical implications and is not standard in histopathological examinations.
- Variability in AE diagnosis hinders its clinical utility.
Purpose Of The Study
- To determine interobserver variability in AE diagnosis.
- To identify features for consistent AE identification.
- To refine diagnostic criteria for AE.
Main Methods
- Retrospective review of 266 ovarian endometrioma cases (1985-2017).
- Two independent pathologists re-evaluated cases using predefined criteria.
- Consensus meeting to resolve discrepancies and adjust criteria.
Main Results
- Initial AE reports in 11.7% of cases.
- Pathologists identified AE in 18% of cases, reduced to 7.1% after consensus.
- Adjusted diagnostic criteria were established post-consensus.
Conclusions
- High interobserver variability in AE diagnosis is evident.
- Stricter, refined criteria are proposed for uniform AE identification.
- Consistent AE documentation is crucial for understanding its link to malignant transformation.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

