Description of probiotic use in preterm infants in England and Wales 2016-2022

Alice Aveline1,2, Lisa Szatkowski3, Janet Berrington4,5

  • 1Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK aa2522@ic.ac.uk.

BMJ Paediatrics Open
|July 24, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Probiotic use in preterm infants increased significantly, with over half receiving them by 2022. However, some infants in probiotic units did not receive them, highlighting variability in care for premature infants.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Microbiome Research

Background:

  • Probiotics are increasingly used in neonatal units for preterm infants.
  • Understanding current probiotic usage patterns and influencing factors is crucial for optimizing care.
  • Variability in probiotic administration may impact outcomes for vulnerable infants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the current use of probiotics in preterm infants (<32 weeks gestational age) in neonatal units.
  • To explore factors associated with probiotic exposure and non-exposure in this population.
  • To provide data for future research on probiotic safety and efficacy in neonates.

Main Methods:

  • An observational study utilizing prospectively recorded health data from England and Wales.
  • Included 48,048 infants born at <32 weeks gestational age admitted to neonatal units (2016-2022).
  • Analyzed probiotic use, timing of initiation, discontinuation, and factors influencing administration.

Main Results:

  • Probiotic use rose from 9% to 54% between 2016 and 2022.
  • Probiotics were initiated around postnatal day 5, earlier for more mature infants, and often after enteral feeds.
  • 23% of infants in 'probiotic units' did not receive probiotics, often due to lower gestational age or higher illness severity.

Conclusions:

  • Over half of very preterm infants received probiotics by 2022, but significant variation in use persists.
  • Nearly a quarter of infants in high-usage units did not receive probiotics, indicating potential disparities in care.
  • Findings inform interpretation of observational data and guide future clinical trials on probiotics for preterm infants.
Abstract