Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

07:57
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
13.5K
Accuracy of digitizing elastomeric impression materials using a dental laboratory scanner.
Jiyun Park1, Takuya Kihara1, Tomoko Ikawa1
1Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Tsurumi University, Yokohama, Japan.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research
|July 24, 2025
Summary
The blue silicone impression material, Imprinsis Regular, demonstrated superior digitization accuracy and microstep detectability compared to other materials when scanned with a blue-light laboratory scanner. These findings support digital dentistry applications.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Digital dentistry
- Metrology
Background:
- Conventional silicone impressions are widely used in dentistry.
- Digital scanning of impressions offers potential for improved workflow and accuracy.
- Understanding the impact of impression material properties on scan data is crucial for digital dentistry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy and precision of scanned data from four conventional silicone impression materials.
- To investigate the effect of impression material properties, specifically color, on laboratory scanner performance.
- To evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, surface reproducibility, and microstep detectability of scanned silicone impressions.
Main Methods:
- Four silicone impression materials (Imprinsis Regular, Fusion II, Fit Checker, Imprint3) were used to create impressions of a master model.
- Impressions were scanned using a blue-light laboratory scanner.
- Data were analyzed for 3D reconstruction feasibility, surface reproducibility, and microstep detectability using ANOVA and Tukey's test.
Main Results:
- Three-dimensional reconstruction was successful for all materials except Imprint3.
- Scanning performance was influenced by the spectral reflection factor of the impression material.
- Imprinsis Regular showed significantly better detectability of small step heights (P < 0.05) compared to other materials.
- No significant difference in surface reproducibility was found among the three successfully reconstructed impression materials.
Conclusions:
- Impression material color impacts digitization accuracy with blue-light scanners.
- Imprinsis Regular exhibited higher digitization accuracy.
- Despite variations, the accuracy of the three reconstructible materials falls within clinical tolerance.
- These results can expand digital dentistry applications and reduce errors in dental material usage.

