Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Preparation of Expanded Chitin Foams and their Use in the Removal of Aqueous Copper
Published on: February 27, 2021
Comparative chromium adsorptive capacity of different low-cost materials using fixed bed column
Asma Shakeel1, Inayat Mustafa Khan2, Faheem Jeelani3
1Division of Soil Science & Agricultural Chemistry, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Kashmir, India.
This study evaluated activated charcoal, sawdust, and rice husk for removing chromium(VI) from water using a fixed-bed column. Activated charcoal showed the highest efficiency, but sawdust and rice husk are cost-effective alternatives for chromium remediation.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Water Treatment Technologies
- Adsorption Processes
Background:
- Heavy metals, particularly chromium(VI), pose significant environmental threats due to their toxicity and persistence.
- Adsorption is an effective method for heavy metal remediation, offering flexibility and high-quality treated water.
- Fixed-bed column adsorption is a continuous process suitable for large-scale water treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the chromium(VI) adsorption efficiency of activated charcoal, sawdust, and rice husk in a fixed-bed column.
- To investigate the impact of operational parameters (flow rate, bed height, metal concentration) on chromium(VI) adsorption.
- To determine optimal parameters for chromium(VI) removal using breakthrough curve analysis.
Main Methods:
- Continuous adsorption experiments were conducted in a fixed-bed column.
- Three adsorbent materials (activated charcoal, sawdust, rice husk) were tested for chromium(VI) removal.
- Breakthrough curve analysis was used to evaluate adsorption performance and optimize operational parameters.
Main Results:
- Activated charcoal demonstrated the highest chromium(VI) adsorption efficiency, followed by rice husk, then sawdust.
- Optimal parameters for chromium(VI) removal (30 mg L⁻¹) included a bed depth of 30 cm and a flow rate of 30 mL min⁻¹.
- Lower metal concentration, reduced flow rate, and increased bed height led to longer breakthrough times, indicating greater treatment capacity.
Conclusions:
- Activated charcoal is highly effective for chromium(VI) removal, but sawdust and rice husk offer economical and accessible alternatives.
- The Yoon-Nelson model accurately described the chromium(VI) adsorption process in the fixed-bed system (R² = 0.9476).
- Operational parameters significantly influence the efficiency and capacity of chromium(VI) adsorption in fixed-bed columns.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Silica Gel Column Chromatography: Overview
Polar components tend to bind strongly to the silica gel, causing them to move slowly through the column. In contrast, nonpolar compounds...
Principles Of Column Chromatography
Types Of Column Chromatography
Gel Filtration Chromatography
When the...
Chromatography: Introduction
The phase in which the compounds linger or on which the compounds adsorb is called the stationary phase, whereas the mobile phase is the solvent that carries the solutes to be analyzed. In traditional column chromatography, the mixture flows through the stationary phase, and the compounds partition between the stationary and mobile phases...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Analyte Adsorption and Distribution

