Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption
Published on: June 20, 2025
Association of impaired pulmonary function and objectively measured physical activity in a population study
Maria Lopmeri1,2, Tiina Mattila3,4, Kari Tokola5
1Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Meilahti Triangle Hospital, 6th floor, PO Box 372, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. maria.lopmeri@helsinki.fi.
Abstract:
Due to modern lifestyles, physical activity (PA) has decreased at a population level, resulting in health concerns worldwide. Increased level of PA can reduce mortality and morbidity in pulmonary diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Many previous studies on the association between pulmonary function and PA assessed PA by questionnaires. We aimed to study the cross-sectional association between pulmonary function and objectively measured PA and sedentary behavior (SB) in population-based data. A total of 4729 subjects participated in the Health 2011 survey, which represents the Finnish adult population. Of these, 1511 completed spirometry and the required 4-day accelerometer wear time. Spirometry values of forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were determined. We compared the differences in daily PA measured with triaxial accelerometer between those with obstructive or restrictive spirometry results (defined as FEV1/FVC < -1.65 z-score, lower limit of normal [LLN] and FVC < -1.65 z-score, respectively) and those with FEV1 < -1.65 z-score to those with normal spirometry in adjusted logistic regression analysis. Airway obstruction, pulmonary restriction, and FEV1 < LLN were associated with less time spent in moderate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.99; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-1.00; OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87, respectively) and moderate-to-vigorous level of PA (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.98; OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.94; OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.82, respectively). Those with restrictive spirometry had greater time spent sedentary and a lower daily step count when compared to those with normal spirometry. Respective ORs with 95% CIs were 1.09 (1.01-1.19) and 0.85 (0.75-0.96). Our results show the association between impaired pulmonary function and measured lower level of daily PA. Restriction associated with greater time spent sedentary and a lower daily step count when compared with those with normal spirometry, airway obstruction, and FEV1 < LLN.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
Chronic Inflammation

