Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Mechanobiology of Tendon Impingement – A Multiaxial Murine Hind Limb Explant Model
Published on: December 8, 2023
Endoscopic versus open surgery for insertional achilles tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of
Po-Yuan Chen1, I-Shiang Tzeng2, Kai-Chiang Yang1,3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation New Taipei City Taiwan.
Purpose:
Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) causes chronic hindfoot pain and functional impairment. Although conservative treatment remains the first-line management approach, surgery is often necessary when nonoperative measures fail. Both open and endoscopic techniques are commonly used, but their comparative efficacy remains debated. Accordingly, this meta-analysis compared surgical outcomes, complications and recovery between open and endoscopic techniques; it also conducted a subgroup analysis to assess return to sports in highly active individuals.
Methods:
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and Embase (2003-2024). Studies were included if they reported outcomes for open or endoscopic IAT surgery with ≥20 patients and ≥6 months of follow-up. Outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, time to return to sports, complication rates and additional functional outcome measures.
Results:
Thirty-nine studies (1559 patients, 1625 procedures) were included. Mean AOFAS scores improved from 56.07 to 89.17 (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between surgical techniques (p = 0.18). However, endoscopic surgery was associated with a lower complication rate and faster recovery, enabling earlier return to daily activities (6.75 ± 2.25 vs. 22.45 ± 4.74 weeks, p < 0.001) and sports (12.63 ± 2.2 vs. 22.13 ± 7.42 weeks, p < 0.001). Among highly active individuals, endoscopic surgery facilitated return to sports within 12-18 months, whereas open surgery required 20-30 months.
Conclusions:
Endoscopic surgery demonstrates a low complication rate and expedited recovery, making it a preferable option for patients requiring an early return to activity. More high-quality studies, such as randomized controlled trials and standardized protocols, are needed to improve surgical decisions and treatment strategies for IAT.
Level Of Evidence:
Level IV.

