Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Preventing opioid prescribing for low back pain using multimodal mechanical stimulation vs. TENS: a
Amy L Baxter1,2, Jena L Etnoyer-Slaski3, Jessica Allia Rice Williams4
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta GA, United States.
A new multimodal mechanical stimulation (M-Stim) device for low back pain (LBP) significantly reduced opioid prescriptions and use compared to TENS. This offers a promising alternative to opioids for LBP management.
Area of Science:
- Pain Management
- Neuromodulation
- Opioid Use Disorder Prevention
Background:
- Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause for opioid prescriptions, contributing to opioid use disorder (OUD).
- Effective non-opioid LBP treatments face implementation barriers and limited insurance coverage.
- A multimodal mechanical stimulation (M-Stim) device shows promise for LBP pain reduction, but its effect on opioid use is unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of an M-Stim device on reducing opioid prescribing and use in patients with moderate-to-severe LBP.
- To compare the efficacy of M-Stim versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in managing LBP and associated opioid use.
- To identify risk factors for prolonged opioid use in opioid-naïve LBP patients.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind, NIH-funded study randomized 159 patients with moderate-to-severe LBP to M-Stim or TENS devices for 30 minutes daily.
- Analgesic use was tracked daily for 28 days, with new opioid prescribing monitored weekly for 3 months.
- Primary outcome: opioid prescribing in opioid-naïve subjects; secondary outcomes: MME, use days, and comparison to national prescribing rates.
Main Results:
- Zero opioid-naïve M-Stim participants received prescriptions (0% vs. 8.6% for TENS, p=0.086).
- Opioid users on M-Stim used significantly fewer MME (7.5 vs. 498.5, p<0.0001) and reported fewer days of use (4.2% vs. 37%, p=0.0018) compared to TENS.
- M-Stim reduced MME in opioid users (-44.6%), use days for patients with BMI ≥30, and overall prescribing rates compared to national averages (-63%, p=0.002).
Conclusions:
- The M-Stim device significantly reduced opioid-related outcomes in LBP patients compared to TENS.
- M-Stim demonstrated potential as a non-opioid alternative for managing moderate-to-severe LBP, particularly in opioid-naïve individuals.
- The study highlights M-Stim's efficacy in reducing opioid use and prescribing, addressing a critical gap in LBP management.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
06:03Operational and Intervention Effects of Targeted Tuina in Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Model Rabbits
Published on: July 21, 2023