Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Preventing opioid prescribing for low back pain using multimodal mechanical stimulation vs. TENS: a
Amy L Baxter1,2, Jena L Etnoyer-Slaski3, Jessica Allia Rice Williams4
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta GA, United States.
Background:
Low back pain (LBP) is the most common reason for outpatient opioid prescribing: a quarter of patients receive prescriptions, leading to opioid use disorder (OUD) in 5%. Guideline-recommended multimodal interventions often face implementation barriers, and effective modalities (e.g., electrical stimulation) lack coverage. A multimodal mechanical stimulation (M-Stim) device for LBP has demonstrated safety and efficacy in pain reduction, but its impact on opioid use has not yet been determined.
Methods:
As part of an NIH-funded double-blind study to reduce pain and opioid use, patients with moderate-to-severe LBP presenting to two suburban chiropractic centers were randomized to receive either the M-Stim device or a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit for 30 min daily, in addition to other therapies. Analgesic use was reported daily for 28 days, with new prescribing followed weekly for 3 months. The primary outcome was prescribing in the opioid-naïve subjects. Secondary endpoints included risk factors for prolonged use in the opioid-naïve subjects, milligram morphine equivalents (MME) for opioid users between the first and last 2 weeks, and prescribing compared with national rates.
Results:
After informed consent, 159 eligible patients were randomized to M-Stim (87) or TENS (72) (mean age 42.6 years, 54% female, BMI 30.9, NRS 5.5) between 23 June 2022 and 31 December 2023. Zero opioid-naïve M-Stim participants (n = 43) received prescriptions (0% vs. 8.6%, Fisher's exact p = 0.086), and those taking opioids used significantly fewer MME [7.5 (SD 3.54) vs. 498.5 MME (SD 474.9), p < 0.0001] for fewer of reported days [M-Stim 2/47 (4.2%)] compared with TENS [n = 36, 38/102 (37%), RR 0.11 (95% CI 0.28-0.44), p = 0.0018]. M-Stim significantly reduced MME in opioid users [-44.6% (32.33 MME), p = 0.02], use days for those with BMI ≥30 [-3 (99% CI -5.73 to -0.26), p = 0.032], and prescribing compared with national rates [9.8% vs. 25%, -63%, RR 0.32 (95% CI 0.16-0.66), p = 0.002] while TENS did not.
Conclusions:
Among chiropractic patients with moderate-to-severe LBP, added use of a multimodal M-Stim device in the opioid-naïve subjects significantly reduced factors associated with OUD compared with TENS and reduced use days for those with BMI ≥30. This novel device is a potential alternative to prescribing opioids as first line for LBP management.
Clinical Trial Registration:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04491175, identifier NCT04491175.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
06:03Operational and Intervention Effects of Targeted Tuina in Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Model Rabbits
Published on: July 21, 2023