Revolutionizing Postdoctoral Training Using the Social Ecological Model: Insights and Experiences from the Propel...

Area of Science:

• Biological and Biomedical Sciences
• Academic Science Careers
• Postdoctoral Training

Background:

• Declining number of U.S. citizens in postdoctoral positions within biological and biomedical sciences.
• Significant disparities in recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups in academic science careers.
• Need for reforms in postdoctoral training to address these trends.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate the effectiveness of the Stanford Propel Postdoctoral Program in addressing postdoctoral training dissatisfaction and disparities.
• To explore how social, cohort, financial, and institutional support impacts diverse postdoctoral trainees.
• To assess the program's role in diversifying the professoriate.

Main Methods:

• The study focuses on the Stanford Propel Postdoctoral Program, which implements a social-ecological model.
• The program provides comprehensive support to diverse postdoctoral trainees.
• Perspectives from Propel scholars are gathered to understand program benefits.

Main Results:

• The Propel Program integrates recommendations from a National Institute of Health advisory committee.
• Scholars report significant benefits to their postdoctoral training experience due to the program's support.
• The program actively works towards diversifying the academic science workforce.

Conclusions:

• Reforming postdoctoral training through comprehensive support models is crucial for reversing negative trends.
• Programs like Stanford Propel demonstrate a successful framework for supporting diverse trainees.
• Diversifying the professoriate requires targeted interventions and support systems for underrepresented scientists.