Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025
09:06
Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
8.2K
Nontrivial Spin Dynamics Synergy in a Weakly Coupled Heteroanisotropic Dysprosium Chain-Based Array
Wei Deng1, Shan-Nan Du1, Yan-Cong Chen1
1Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry, IGCME, GBRCE for Functional Molecular Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, P. R. China.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
|July 25, 2025
Summary
Researchers created novel weakly coupled hetero-spin chains using dysprosium. These chains exhibit unique quantum tunneling and controlled spin dynamics, paving the way for quantum information applications.
Area of Science:
- Molecular magnetism
- Quantum materials
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Spin chains (SCs) are crucial for quantum effects and applications.
- Challenges exist in aligning heteroanisotropic spins for molecular spin engineering.
- Single-molecule magnets (SMMs) offer a bottom-up approach for constructing spin chains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize novel 1D heteroanisotropic dysprosium spin chains.
- To investigate the spin dynamics and quantum phenomena in these chains.
- To explore potential applications in quantum information storage and processing.
Main Methods:
- Chemical synthesis of dysprosium-based spin chains (SC-α, SC-β, SC-αβ).
- Coordination bond formation linking Ising-like dysprosium units.
- Magnetic measurements to analyze spin dynamics and quantum tunneling.
Main Results:
- Successfully created three novel 1D dysprosium spin chains (SC-α, SC-β, SC-αβ).
- The hetero-SMM chain (SC-αβ) showed synergistic spin dynamics and two-stage magnetic quantum tunneling.
- Demonstrated controlled spin orientation between heterodysprosium units via magnetizing paths.
Conclusions:
- Weakly coupled heteroanisotropic spin chains exhibit unique quantum phenomena.
- These chains offer distinct relaxation lifetimes for advanced quantum applications.
- Findings advance molecular spin engineering and quantum information technologies.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.0K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.0K
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.1K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.1K
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.2K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.2K
01:08NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
1.6K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.6K
01:02¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
1.1K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.1K
01:22Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K