Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
How Does Load Selection and Sex Influence 1RM Prediction Using the Minimal Velocity Threshold During Free-Weight Back
Emanuele Dello Stritto1, Ruggero Romagnoli2, Michele Nocchi1
1Department of Human Movement and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza L. De Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
The aim of the present study is to predict a 1RM through the load-velocity relationship using the minimum velocity threshold (MVT) in a free-weight back squat. Twenty-five males and twenty-five females performed a 1RM test during a free-weight back squat, based on which individual load-velocity relationships were created. Ten regression models to predict the 1RM were developed. The models included a two-point (mean propulsive velocity (MPV) ≈ 1 m·s-1; MPV ≈ 0.50 m·s-1) and a three-point linear equation (MPV ≈ 1 m·s-1; MPV ≈ 0.75 m·s-1; and MPV ≈ 0.50 m·s-1) with an MVT of 0.3 m·s-1 and 0.4 m·s-1 and, additionally, an MVT of 0.25 m·s-1 for females. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences between the predicted and measured 1RM in males using an MVT of 0.30 m·s-1 and in females with an MVT of 0.25 m·s-1. In contrast, models using an MVT of 0.30 m·s-1 in females underestimated the measured 1RM, as did those using an MVT of 0.40 m·s-1 in both sexes. It appears possible to accurately predict the 1RM during a free-weight back squat using the load-velocity relationship. However, it is important to avoid using loads with velocities higher than 1 m·s-1 for the regression models and to use different MVTs for males and females.
Related Concept Videos
Eccentric Loading
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...

