Triage of Stable Patients With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction and Left Bundle Branch Block: A Multicenter,
Sascha Macherey-Meyer1, Sebastian Heyne, Max Maria Meertens
1University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany; Cardiology III Angiology, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Department of Cardiology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Augustinerinnen Teaching Hospital, Cologne, Germany; Department of Medicine and Cardio-Diabetes Center Cologne, St. Antonius Hospital, Cologne, Germany; Cardiology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Protestant Hospital Köln-Kalk, Cologne, Germany; Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, and Rhythmology, Porz am Rhein Hospital gGmbH, Cologne, Germany; Internal Medicine III - Cardiology, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Cologne, Germany; Department of Medicine II, Cologne Municipal Hospitals gGmbH, Merheim Hospital, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Germany.
Stable patients with Left Bundle Branch Block Acute Myocardial Infarction (LBBB-AMI) show similar outcomes to ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients, with a high rate of acute culprit lesions. This supports routine emergency coronary angiography for LBBB-AMI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Left Bundle Branch Block Acute Myocardial Infarction (LBBB-AMI) management often follows ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) protocols.
- Differentiating LBBB-AMI patients who require immediate invasive strategy is crucial.
- This study compares outcomes in stable LBBB-AMI patients versus matched STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of stable, symptomatic patients with suspected LBBB-AMI to matched STEMI patients.
- To evaluate the need for immediate invasive strategies in LBBB-AMI.
- To identify specific characteristics of LBBB-AMI relevant to treatment decisions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a German STEMI network.
- Stratification based on ECG findings: STEMI or LBBB.
- Propensity score matching (PSM) and adjusted analyses were performed on stable patients.
Main Results:
- Out of 4563 patients, 344 had LBBB-AMI and 4219 had STEMI.
- After PSM (187 LBBB-AMI, 557 STEMI), LBBB-AMI patients had higher odds of impaired infarct-related artery patency post-PCI (OR 2.18).
- Approximately 70% of LBBB-AMI patients presented with acute culprit lesions requiring intervention, with lower peak creatine kinase levels compared to STEMI.
Conclusions:
- Seven out of ten symptomatic LBBB-AMI patients have acute culprit lesions necessitating timely PCI.
- Findings support routine emergency coronary angiography for suspected LBBB-AMI.
- Further prospective trials are needed for more selective patient triage.
More Related Videos
09:21Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
