Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
Comprehensive observations and multidisciplinary approaches (COMA) in the management of unconscious patients: a
Nüesch Liliane1, Kai Tisljar1, Sebastian Berger1
1Intensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Background:
Managing patients with coma of unknown etiology presents a challenge requiring rapid, structured assessment. We aimed to examine how physicians from different specialties manage patients with coma of unknown etiology and adhere to recommendations in a highly standardized scenario.
Methods:
Prospective high-fidelity simulation study conducted at an academic simulation center involving 50 physicians from acute care (38%), internal medicine (36%), and neurology (26%). Participants were confronted with a standardized coma scenario. Performance was assessed for adherence to expert-recommended clinical assessments (primary endpoints) and timing of interventions, such as airway protection, oxygen administration, toxicological screening, and self-evaluation (secondary endpoints).
Results:
All participants recognized coma; 80% assessed the Glasgow Coma Scale, with 40% quantifying it correctly. 20% completed ABCDE assessments, with 66% performing head-to-toe examinations. Airway inspection was conducted by 89% of acute care physicians, 70% of neurologists, and 60% of internists. A median of 4 ancillary tests were ordered, mostly neuroimaging (98%) and toxicological screening (86%), while rare toxin screening (2%) and EEG (12%) were scarce. Oxygen was universally administered (100%), but treatment response was rarely checked (8%). Side-positioning for airway protection was infrequent (21% acute care, 15% neurology, 6% internal medicine), while intubation was more commonly ordered by internists (17%). Prior simulator training improved side-positioning rates (27% vs. 4%, p = 0.047). Self-evaluations showed high motivation (median 8/10) but moderate confidence (5/10).
Conclusions:
This study highlights specialty-specific differences, misconceptions, and gaps in managing coma of unknown etiology, including inconsistent diagnostic workup and missed treatments, emphasizing the need for guidelines, standardized care and training.
Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov registry (ID NCT06265168).
Related Concept Videos
Freudian Psychology
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
Management of Insomnia
Stages of General Anesthesia
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...

