Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
Using machine learning to predict remission after surgery for pituitary adenoma: a systematic review and
Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh1, Bardia Hajikarimloo2, Behnaz Niroomand3
1Skull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ibrahim.mdz7777@gmail.com.
Purpose:
Postoperative remission in pituitary adenoma (PA) patients significantly affects treatment outcomes and quality of life. Accurate prediction of remission is crucial for neurosurgeons and oncologists as it aids in personalizing treatment plans, optimizing follow-up care, and preventing unnecessary interventions. Unlike diagnostic classification, this review specifically focuses on remission prediction as a distinct prognostic application of AI. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting remission outcomes in PA patients.
Methods:
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the google scholar was conducted to identify eligible studies until Dec 2024. Data on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted from the included studies.
Results:
Out of 1530 studies screened, 10 met our eligibility criteria involving ML approaches in patients with confirmed PA. ML algorithms, particularly artificial neural networks (ANN), offer promising performance for predicting remission outcomes in PA patients. Meta-analysis of 10 studies resulted in a pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11-0.32), negative DLR of 15.26 (95% CI: 8.23-28.26), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 28.25 (95% CI: 10.85-73.57), the diagnostic score was 3.34 (95% CI: 2.38-4.3) and an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93).
Conclusion:
ML-based models demonstrate moderate to high diagnostic accuracy in predicting remission outcomes in PA patients. While these models show promise in enhancing clinical decision-making post-surgery, further prospective validation and larger studies are necessary before their routine clinical integration.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
07:15Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020