Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Dual-Functional Electroactive Filter Towards Simultaneously SbIII Oxidation and Sequestration
Published on: December 5, 2019
Antimony(V) Retention by Lepidocrocite: Sorption, Coprecipitation, and Extractability.
Mona Hosseinpour Moghaddam1, Niloofar Karimian2,3, Scott G Johnston1,4
1Faculty of Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW 2480, Australia.
This study reveals antimony(V) coprecipitation with lepidocrocite involves structural substitution, while sorption involves surface sharing. Extraction schemes show varying efficacy in recovering antimony(V) from lepidocrocite.
Area of Science:
- Geochemistry
- Environmental Science
- Mineralogy
Background:
- Antimony (Sb) is a metalloid with significant environmental implications, often found in aquatic systems associated with iron (Fe) oxides.
- Understanding antimony sorption and coprecipitation mechanisms with mineral phases like lepidocrocite is crucial for predicting its environmental fate.
- Assessing the effectiveness of common extraction schemes is vital for accurate geochemical speciation and risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the structural mechanisms controlling antimony(V) sorption and coprecipitation with lepidocrocite.
- To evaluate the performance of Wenzel and BCR sequential extraction schemes in recovering sorbed and coprecipitated antimony(V) from lepidocrocite.
- To provide insights into the reliability of common analytical methods for antimony speciation in environmental samples.
Main Methods:
- Antimony K-edge EXAFS spectroscopy was employed to determine the structural environment of Sb(V) sorbed and coprecipitated with lepidocrocite.
- Sequential extraction procedures, including Wenzel and BCR schemes, were utilized to assess antimony recovery.
- Dissolution experiments in 1 M HCl were conducted to compare the release behavior of Sb and Fe under different retention mechanisms.
Main Results:
- EXAFS analysis indicated Sb(V) coprecipitation involves Sb(V)-for-Fe(III) substitution within the lepidocrocite structure.
- Sorption was characterized by edge and double-corner sharing of SbO6 and FeO6 octahedra at the mineral surface.
- Sb(V) sorption led to faster Sb dissolution than Fe in HCl, while coprecipitation resulted in congruent dissolution.
- The Wenzel scheme underestimated surface sorption but recovered sorbed and coprecipitated Sb(V) in later steps.
- The BCR scheme poorly recovered Sb(V), misinterpreting its association with lepidocrocite.
Conclusions:
- Coprecipitation and sorption represent distinct Sb(V) retention mechanisms by lepidocrocite, with differing structural linkages and dissolution behaviors.
- Sequential extraction schemes exhibit significant limitations in accurately quantifying Sb(V) associated with lepidocrocite, particularly the BCR method.
- This research highlights the importance of understanding mineral-surface interactions and critically evaluating analytical methodologies for accurate environmental assessment of antimony.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Types of Coprecipitation
Sometimes, ions in a crystal lattice can undergo isomorphous replacement by inclusions of similar charge and size. For...
Precipitation of Ions
The equation that describes the equilibrium between solid calcium carbonate and its solvated ions is:
Gravimetry: Inorganic And Organic Precipitating Agents
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...

