The cost of asking: Extending the dimensions of willful ignorance

  • 0Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

People sometimes ignore information deliberately to avoid social awkwardness, not just personal discomfort. This willful ignorance stems from a desire to maintain social harmony and relationships, even if it means missing out on knowledge.

Area Of Science

  • Psychology
  • Social Science

Background

  • Willful ignorance is often explained by the emotional costs of confronting uncomfortable information.
  • However, the social costs associated with seeking information have been largely overlooked.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To explore the role of social costs in willful ignorance.
  • To propose a more comprehensive understanding of deliberate information avoidance.

Main Methods

  • The study draws on theoretical frameworks from social psychology and behavioral economics.
  • Experimental evidence is used to investigate the motivations behind avoiding sensitive questions.

Main Results

  • Individuals may avoid asking questions to preserve social harmony, trust, and privacy.
  • Social motivations, such as respecting norms and avoiding relational risks, significantly influence information-seeking behavior.

Conclusions

  • Willful ignorance is not solely driven by individual psychological discomfort.
  • Interpersonal dynamics and the desire to maintain social relationships are crucial factors in the decision to remain ignorant.

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic 01:25

7.4K

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...

Cognitive Dissonance 01:38

33.7K

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Persuasion Strategies 01:52

39.7K

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).

Get Your Foot in the Door

The first effective strategy is the foot-in-the-door technique (Cialdini, 2001; Pliner, Hart, Kohl, & Saari, 1974): If a persuader—such as a...

Hindsight Biases 01:12

3.9K

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 

 

This text is adapted from OpenStax, Psychology. OpenStax...

Problem Solving: Dimensional Analysis 01:08

4.5K

Every mathematical equation that connects separate distinct physical quantities must be dimensionally consistent, which implies it must abide by two rules. For this reason, the concept of dimension is crucial. The first rule is that an equation's expressions on either side of an equality must have the exact same dimension, i.e., quantities of the same dimension can be added or removed. The second rule stipulates that all popular mathematical functions, such as exponential, logarithmic, and...

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying 01:19

221

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...