Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Multidimensional Coculture System to Model Lung Squamous Carcinoma Progression
Published on: March 17, 2020
Perspectives on Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 on Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Study
Alison S Baskin1, Michael P Stover2, Manvir Bains2
1Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Introduction:
In 2021, the Commission on Cancer implemented Standard 5.8, which requires that lymph nodes be sampled from ≥1 hilar and ≥3 different mediastinal lymph node stations for all curative-intent lung cancer resections. While 80% compliance is expected of all Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals, recent data illustrates only half of sites are currently meeting criteria. We evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators in implementing Standard 5.8.
Methods:
In this multicenter qualitative study, 20 semistructured interviews were conducted across academic and community-based institutions. We interviewed key stakeholders, including thoracic surgeons, pathologists, operating room staff, a cancer liaison physician, and clinical data analysts. Thematic analysis was facilitated by the tailored implementation for chronic disease checklist.
Results:
Themes were mapped to six tailored implementation for chronic disease domains. Most participants felt the guideline was not burdensome and did not alter their clinical practices. Although many agreed that a minimum threshold for lymph node evaluation should exist, some participants were uncertain of the supporting evidence and identified potential technical and clinical barriers to implementation. Interdisciplinary collaboration was a key facilitator to compliance, as well as alignment with professional society guidelines. Higher compliance rates were thought to be driven by increased monitoring and performance feedback, in addition to departmental leadership and support.
Conclusions:
Mixed opinions regarding Standard 5.8 align with currently low national compliance rates. Participants emphasized the need for additional evidence to support the standard, underscoring the importance of future prospective studies. Support for strong interdisciplinary communication, regularly scheduled feedback, endorsement by cardiothoracic societies and departmental leadership may improve compliance.
More Related Videos
07:44Practical Considerations in Studying Metastatic Lung Colonization in Osteosarcoma Using the Pulmonary Metastasis Assay
Published on: March 12, 2018
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cancer Prevention
Some...