Surgical Ablation by a Right Mini-thoracotomy Versus a Median Sternotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of...

A minimally invasive approach by a right mini-thoracotomy has been developed for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. However, the efficacy and safety compared to a median sternotomy remains unclear.

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed for primary (recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias at 1 and 2 years) and secondary (hospital and ICU stay, adverse events, 30-day mortality, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamp time) end-points. We compared end-points using risk ratio (RR) for binary outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous ones. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI) and used the random-effects model for all outcomes. We performed subgroup analysis for the main outcome based on lesion set, energy source, type of surgery, and propensity score matching.

We included 12 observational studies (n = 3122). No difference was found for the primary outcome at 1 (RR 0.8; [95% CI]: 0.62-1.03; P = 0.08) and 2 years (RR 0.9; [95% CI]: 0.74-1.13; P = 0.4). The thoracotomy group had lower complications (RR 0.72; [95% CI]: 0.55-0.97; P = 0.016), 30-day mortality (OR 0.26; [95% CI]: 0.10-0.70; P = 0.007), hospital stay (MD -5.35; [95% CI]: -7.94 to 2.77; P < 0.001), and ICU stay (MD -2.21; [95% CI]: -3.02 to 1.40; P < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping time were significantly higher in the thoracotomy group.

This meta-analysis found that surgical ablation by a mini-thoracotomy might achieve similar rhythm control to a median sternotomy while possibly improving safety and promoting faster recovery. However, conclusions are limited by the observational nature of the evidence and randomized trials are warranted.