Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

6.5K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
6.5K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

6.7K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
6.7K
Epistasis Analysis01:09

Epistasis Analysis

5.2K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
5.2K
Genetic Lingo01:11

Genetic Lingo

104.8K
Overview
104.8K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

67.2K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
67.2K
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

38.7K
The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
38.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decision-Making Criteria in Polygenic Embryo Screening: A Survey of Reproductive Medicine Physicians.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

PEStimate: predicting offspring disease risk after polygenic embryo screening.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Modeling polygenic embryo screening in real-world IVF patients demonstrates limitations on efficacy.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

An information content principle explains regulatory patterns of gene expression across human tissues.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Network-based genetic monitoring of landscape fragmentation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Clinical implications of rare and common variation in preimplantation genetic testing for breast cancer.

NPJ genomic medicine·2026
Same journal

Demonstration of a quantum C-NOT gate in a time-multiplexed fully reconfigurable photonic processor.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Nonlinear quantum light source with van der Waals ferroelectric NbOX<sub>2</sub> (X = Br, I).

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Antagonistic histone H2A variants and autonomous heterochromatin formation shape epigenomic patterns in Arabidopsis.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

The long tail of nitrate pollution in groundwater challenges governance of global water quality.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Select microbial metabolites promote tau aggregation in a murine tauopathy model.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Warming climate has lengthened global intense tropical cyclone seasons.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Generating Neuronal Phenotypic Profiles - A Protocol to Culture and Image Human Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons
09:21

Author Spotlight: Generating Neuronal Phenotypic Profiles - A Protocol to Culture and Image Human Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons

Published on: July 7, 2023

1.6K

Predicting the direction of phenotypic difference.

David Gokhman1, Keith D Harris2, Shai Carmi3

  • 1Department of Molecular Genetics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. david.gokhman@weizmann.ac.il.

Nature Communications
|July 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting complex phenotypes from genomes is challenging. This study introduces relative prediction of phenotypic differences, achieving over 90% accuracy in determining directional differences, a more attainable goal in genetic research.

More Related Videos

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

9.8K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Generating Neuronal Phenotypic Profiles - A Protocol to Culture and Image Human Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons
09:21

Author Spotlight: Generating Neuronal Phenotypic Profiles - A Protocol to Culture and Image Human Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons

Published on: July 7, 2023

1.6K
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

9.8K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Predicting complex phenotypes from genomic data is a significant challenge in genetics.
  • Current methods often yield inaccurate predictions for many complex traits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a novel approach for relative prediction of phenotypic differences.
  • To determine if directional phenotypic differences can be accurately predicted from genomic data, even with incomplete genotype-to-phenotype mapping.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a relative prediction framework focusing on phenotypic differences rather than absolute values.
  • Evaluated prediction accuracy on large datasets including individuals from the same family, same population, and across different species.

Main Results:

  • The direction of phenotypic difference was identified with greater than 90% accuracy.
  • The proposed approach demonstrated effectiveness across diverse genetic contexts (family, population, species).
  • This method helps mitigate challenges in transferring genetic association findings between populations.

Conclusions:

  • Relative prediction of phenotypic differences is an achievable and accurate alternative to absolute phenotype prediction.
  • Genomic data holds more potential for extracting phenotypic information than previously recognized.
  • This approach enhances the utility of genomic data for understanding disease risk and other phenotypic variations.