Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
Posterior predictive checks for the detection of extreme response style
Martijn Schoenmakers1, Jesper Tijmstra2, Jeroen Vermunt2
1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands. m.schoenmakers@tilburguniversity.edu.
None:
Extreme response style (ERS), the tendency of participants to select extreme item categories regardless of the item content, has frequently been found to decrease the validity of Likert-type questionnaire results (e.g., Moors, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 271-298, 2012). For this reason, detecting ERS at both the group and individual levels is of paramount importance. While various approaches to detecting ERS exist, these may conflate ERS with the trait of interest, require additional questionnaires to be administered, or require the use of mixture or multidimensional IRT models. As an alternative approach to detecting ERS, Bayesian posterior predictive checks (PPCs) may be a viable option. Posterior predictive checking offers a highly customizable framework for detecting model misfit, which can be directly applied to frequently used unidimensional IRT models. Critically, the use of PPCs to detect ERS does not require strong assumptions regarding the nature of ERS, such as ERS being a continuous dimension or a categorical trait. In this paper, we thus apply PPCs to a generalized partial credit model to detect model misfit related to ERS on both the group and person levels. We propose various possible PPCs tailored to ERS, which are illustrated in an empirical example, and their performance in detecting ERS is examined under various conditions. Suggestions for practical applications are provided, and avenues for future research are explored.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Regression Toward the Mean
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Confirmation Biases

