Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
Published on: January 20, 2023
Heterogeneous and differential treatment effect analysis of safety improvements on freeways using causal inference
Syed Zaier Zaidi1, Xuesong Wang2, Yesihati Azati2
1College of Transportation, Tongji University, 4800 Cao'an Road, Jiading District, Shanghai 201804, China; The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, 4800 Cao'an Road, Jiading District, 201804 Shanghai, China; Highway Research and Training Centre (HRTC), National Highway Authority (NHA), Ministry of Communications, Pakistan.
Abstract:
Evaluating safety effectiveness of freeway design improvements is crucial for enhancing overall safety and confirming the efficacy of specific measures implemented. Limited research has addressed treatment heterogeneities that influence crash outcomes, and previous studies have often been susceptible to confounding biases, which may distort causal inference results. To mitigate confounding biases and establish reliable causal relationships between crashes and treatment interventions, this study employed a causal forest (CF) model to assess the safety efficacy of freeway exit improvements - including lane control, traffic signs, speed-limit signs, and crash attenuators - on freeways in Suzhou, China. We compared naïve and empirical Bayes before-after methods against the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimated by the CF approach. Geometric design and traffic operation characteristics were then considered in measuring the Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTE) of these improvements, with the aim of identifying road features where treatment benefits were most pronounced. Additionally, a Differential Treatment Effects (DTE) analysis within a causal framework was employed to estimate treatment effects on the residuals, uncovering more intricate and complex causal relationships. The study demonstrated that CF method provides more stable ATE estimates. An analysis of the distribution of the treatment effects revealed a diverse range of impacts, indicating both positive and negative outcomes. Significant variability in treatment effects was evident from heterogeneous testing results. Noteworthy outcomes from treating freeway exits were observed in areas with an Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) ranging from 12,000 to 28,000 vehicles per day, average speeds of 95 km/h and above, two or four lanes on each side, and an exit-only ramp configuration. These findings contribute to valuable technical insights for selecting and evaluating safety enhancement strategies on freeways.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Causality in Epidemiology
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

