Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

153
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
153
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

700
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
700
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

303
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
303
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

2.0K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
2.0K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing before learning: Exploring the robustness of the pretesting effect.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Erring on the side of caution: Two failures to replicate the derring effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Unraveling the benefits of experiencing errors during learning: Definition, modulating factors, and explanatory theories.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.2K

The Pretesting Effect: Exploring the Impact of Feedback and Final Test Timing.

Yeray Mera1, Nataliya Dianova1, Eugenia Marin-Garcia1

  • 1University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Spain.

Journal of Cognition
|July 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Attempting to recall information before learning (pretesting) improves memory more than simply reading. Optimal learning occurs with immediate feedback and testing, but the pretesting benefit persists even with delays.

Keywords:
Error learningFeedback timingPretesting effectRetrievalTesting

More Related Videos

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.2K
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • The pretesting effect indicates that effortful retrieval, even with errors, enhances memory retention compared to errorless learning.
  • Optimal timing for feedback and testing after pretesting remains an area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of feedback and final test timing on the pretesting effect.
  • To compare pretesting with immediate feedback/testing against delayed feedback/testing and errorless learning.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments manipulated feedback delay (immediate, 24h, 48h) and final test timing (immediate, 24h).
  • Recall accuracy was measured and compared across conditions, including a read-only (errorless) control group.

Main Results:

  • Pretesting consistently outperformed the errorless learning condition.
  • Immediate feedback led to better recall than delayed feedback.
  • Immediate testing yielded superior performance compared to delayed testing.

Conclusions:

  • The pretesting effect is robust and beneficial for memory recall.
  • While immediate feedback and testing are optimal, the pretesting advantage endures despite delays.
  • Findings have practical implications for educational strategies, allowing flexibility in feedback and assessment timing.