Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.2K
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

9.0K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
9.0K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

176
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
176
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

422
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
422
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

289
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
289
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Implications and the TaPL AF Study Design.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
Same author

Association of Obesity With Mortality and Bleeding in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2026
Same author

Intermediate-dose anticoagulation in COVID-19: closing the loop on a long-settled question.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2026
Same author

A simple score to identify the sickest normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

ERJ open research·2026
Same author

Pulmonary embolism epidemiology: trends, risk factors, comorbidities, and clinical implications.

European heart journal·2026
Same author

Development and external validation of an international score to predict cancer 1 year after venous thromboembolism.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulation After Successful Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
Same journal

Novel/Recurrent Variants in Pakistani Glanzmann Thrombasthenia and Glanzmann-like bleeding diathesis: Insights from NGS Analysis.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
Same journal

Anti-TFPI Single-Domain Antibodies: Novel Rebalancing Therapies for Hemophilia and Other Rare Bleeding Disorders.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
Same journal

The Interaction of Fibrin with Endothelial Cell Receptor N-Cadherin Promotes Fibrin-Dependent Angiogenesis.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
Same journal

Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor: Can TUXEDO-2 Settle the Debate?

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Comparative Effectiveness Research Using Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: Validity and Feasibility

Behnood Bikdeli1,2,3, Joseph S Ross3,4, Syed Bukhari5

  • 1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis
|July 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ensuring validity in comparative effectiveness research (CER) is key. This review discusses balancing internal, construct, and external validity in study design, using thrombosis research examples.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

706
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

706
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) necessitates rigorous validation for reliable findings.
  • Internal, construct, and external validity are critical components of CER study design.
  • Different study designs, from double-blind randomized trials to observational studies, present unique validity challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the critical aspects of internal, construct, and external validity in CER.
  • To discuss the trade-offs between different study designs concerning validity.
  • To highlight methods for enhancing validity in observational CER studies, with examples from thrombosis research.

Main Methods:

  • The review synthesizes existing knowledge on validity in CER.
  • It contrasts the strengths and limitations of double-blind RCTs, pragmatic RCTs, and observational studies.
  • Methods for mitigating confounding and enhancing construct validity in observational CER are discussed.

Main Results:

  • Double-blind RCTs excel in internal validity but have limited external validity.
  • Pragmatic RCTs offer improved generalizability but may sacrifice internal validity.
  • Observational studies, including target trial emulation, provide high external validity and feasibility but require careful methods to address confounding.

Conclusions:

  • Balancing internal, construct, and external validity is essential for robust CER.
  • Techniques like propensity score matching, falsification testing, and quasi-experimental designs improve the validity of observational studies.
  • Accurate patient profiling and computational phenotypes are crucial for construct validity in observational CER.