Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
Reliable estimation via hybrid gradient boosting machine for mud loss volume in drilling operations
Xiaozhi Lu1, Farag M A Altalbawy2, Tarak Vora3
1School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200000, China. Lxzh192126@163.com.
This study developed a machine learning model to predict drilling mud loss volume, a major cost factor in oil and gas operations. The Gradient Boosting Machine with Bayesian Probability Improvement (GBM-BPI) demonstrated superior accuracy in forecasting mud loss.
Area of Science:
- Petroleum Engineering
- Data Science
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Drilling mud loss significantly increases operational costs and risks in the oil and gas industry.
- Accurate prediction of mud loss volume is crucial for improving drilling efficiency and minimizing non-productive time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a reliable predictive model for drilling mud loss volume using machine learning techniques.
- To enhance drilling efficiency and reduce non-productive time by accurately forecasting mud loss.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dataset of 949 field records from Middle Eastern drilling sites.
- Applied data preprocessing including statistical evaluation, outlier detection, and normalization.
- Employed a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) with hyperparameter tuning via Evolution Strategies (ES), Batch Bayesian Optimization (BBO), Bayesian Probability Improvement (BBI), and Gaussian Process Optimization (GPO).
Main Results:
- The GBM-BPI model achieved the highest test performance with R² = 0.926, MSE = 1208.77, and AARE% = 26.73.
- SHAP analysis identified hole size, formation type, and pressure differential as key predictors of mud loss.
- Solid content was found to have a minimal impact on mud loss volume.
Conclusions:
- The GBM-BPI model provides an accurate and stable prediction of drilling mud loss.
- Understanding key influencing factors like hole size and pressure differential can aid in mitigating mud loss during drilling operations.
More Related Videos
08:47Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
Published on: February 9, 2024
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Reducing Line Loss
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss...
Margin of Error
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Moisture Content and Bulking of Aggregate
When aggregates are exposed to rain or sit in stockpiles, they absorb moisture, which must be...
Differential Leveling
Estimation of the Physical Quantities