Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

615
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
615
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

198
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
198
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

87
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
87
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

289
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
289
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

400
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
400
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

7.8K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bed occupancy forecast for decision-making during periods of high hospital pressure.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same author

The clinical utility of telangiectasia quantification as markers of vascular disease progression in systemic sclerosis.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Geographical Inequalities in Mortality by Age and Gender in Italy, 2002-2019: Insights from a Spatial Extension of the Lee-Carter Model.

Spatial demography·2026
Same author

Spatio-temporal trends and socio-environmental determinants of suicides in England (2002-2022): an ecological population-based study.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same author

The self-management support needs of people diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis: a realist review protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

A randomised crossover trial of staff time with proned patients in the ICU using the 'BathMat'.

Trials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.8K

Smooth predictions for age-period-cohort models: a comparison between splines and random process.

Connor Gascoigne1, Andrea Riebler2, Theresa Smith3

  • 1MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. c.gascoigne@imperial.ac.uk.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|July 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Bayesian random processes outperform frequentist penalized splines for forecasting in Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models. This study demonstrates Bayesian methods offer superior predictive accuracy for health and demographic trend analysis.

Keywords:
Age-period-cohortBayesian modelidentifiabilitypenalised splinespredictionrandom processessmoothing

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

194

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.8K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

194

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Demography

Background:

  • Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models are crucial for analyzing health and demographic trends.
  • Two primary approaches exist: frequentist penalized splines and Bayesian random processes.
  • These methods have historically seen limited integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive performance of frequentist and Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort models.
  • To elucidate the theoretical relationship between penalized splines and random processes.
  • To evaluate model accuracy for both estimation and forecasting.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical comparison of frequentist (penalized splines) and Bayesian (random processes) APC models.
  • Analysis of simulated data to assess estimation and forecasting accuracy.
  • Evaluation using two real-world mental ill-health datasets for in-sample and out-of-sample prediction.

Main Results:

  • Simulation studies showed nearly identical estimation results for both methods.
  • Bayesian random processes demonstrated superior forecasting performance in simulations.
  • Real-world data analysis confirmed close estimation results, with Bayesian methods slightly better.
  • Bayesian random processes significantly improved forecasting accuracy on real-world data.

Conclusions:

  • A clear theoretical link exists between penalized splines and random processes.
  • Bayesian random process models exhibit superior predictive properties for forecasting compared to frequentist penalized splines.
  • This research provides accessible insights into APC modeling for improved health trend prediction.