Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Industrialized, Artificial Intelligence-guided Laser Microdissection for Microscaled Proteomic Analysis of the Tumor Microenvironment
Published on: June 3, 2022
Medical LLMs: Fine-Tuning vs. Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Bhagyajit Pingua1,2, Adyakanta Sahoo1,3, Meenakshi Kandpal2
1Biomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and combined fine-tuning (FT+RAG) improve large language model (LLM) performance in healthcare more than fine-tuning alone. LLAMA and PHI models showed the best results with these specialized training methods.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Informatics
- Natural Language Processing
Background:
- Large language models (LLMs) possess broad knowledge but lack specialized expertise.
- Domain-specific LLM performance can be enhanced through targeted training methodologies.
- Healthcare applications require specialized LLMs capable of accurate and reliable information retrieval and generation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and fine-tuning (FT) on healthcare data for five distinct large language models.
- To compare the performance of RAG alone, FT alone, and a combined FT+RAG approach.
- To identify which models and training strategies yield superior results for specialized healthcare applications.
Main Methods:
- Five large language models (LLama-3.1-8B, Gemma-2-9B, Mistral-7B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B, Phi-3.5-Mini-Instruct) were fine-tuned on the MedQuAD dataset.
- Models were trained using three approaches: retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) only, fine-tuning (FT) only, and a combination of both (FT+RAG).
- Performance was assessed across multiple metrics to evaluate domain-specific accuracy and capabilities.
Main Results:
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and combined fine-tuning (FT+RAG) consistently outperformed fine-tuning (FT) alone across most evaluated models.
- LLAMA and PHI models demonstrated superior performance, with LLAMA showing overall excellence and PHI excelling in RAG/FT+RAG capabilities.
- QWEN models generally lagged in performance, while GEMMA and MISTRAL exhibited varied results depending on the training approach.
Conclusions:
- Specialized training methods, particularly RAG and FT+RAG, are crucial for enhancing LLM performance in niche domains like healthcare.
- The choice of LLM architecture significantly impacts the effectiveness of different training strategies.
- Further research into optimizing these training methods can unlock greater potential for AI in medical information systems.
More Related Videos
03:14Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Methods of Medium Optimization